Make the package consistent with firmware-qcom-adreno packaged from
linux-firmware, but keep them separate for legal reasons. The firmware
packaged in firmware-qcom-adreno-extra does not have a proper license.
[ci:ignore-count]
[ci:skip-build] already built successfully in CI
Now that there is a "unmaintained" category, readd huawei-kiwi
downstream (which got replaced in !1826 (merged)).
[ci:skip-build] already built successfully in CI
Based on Minecrell work at:
https://gitlab.com/Minecrell/pmaports/-/tree/alcatel-idol347-downstream
adapted smb1360 shared patches for idol347 downstream tree,
and added his idol347-like-mainline.patch gist which changes downstream DT
to mimic sane mainline settings for easy battery driver dump comparison.
This is required for kernels earlier than 4.7 for bwrap to work for
normal users, and therefore for gnome web (epiphany) and flatpak.
[ci:skip-build] [ci:ignore-count]
This device port is unmaintained: The mainline port (xiaomi-wt88047)
is preferred. This is only intended for testing, and was used to validate
the battery/charging driver as one example. Various patches are used
for the downstream kernel that expose helpful information for debugging.
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
These are various debugging related patches that I have used over the time
when attempting to get new features working for the mainline kernel.
Given that the downstream kernel is just intended for debugging in this case,
it seems convenient to add them to pmaports so I don't need to go search for
them in case I need them again in the future.
[ci:skip-build] Already built on CI
Not sure why "qemu" is listed in the depends of bq-paella-downstream,
that does not really make sense. Also fixup the pkgdesc of the
nonfree-firmware subpackage, the modem works somewhat now.
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
The "bq-picmt" device port is actually for the same device as the
"bq-paella" device package in community, just with the downstream
kernel. This is useful occasionally for testing.
However, the name applies that this device package should be used
on the BQ variant of the BQ Aquaris X5 (picmt) and the mainline
package should be used on the Cyanogen variant (paella). Actually
both packages work on both variants since the hardware is the same.
To make that clear, rename "bq-picmt" to "bq-paella-downstream".
Right now the "bq-picmt" device port is quite confusing.
It's actually for the same device as "bq-paella", which is in community
and uses the mainline kernel, except that it uses the downstream kernel.
Having the downstream kernel packaged is useful for testing sometimes,
but otherwise the device package is completely unsupported.
The mainline port works much better. The downstream port should only
be used if you know what you are doing (e.g. because you want to test
if something is working on downstream but not mainline) and therefore
it should not show up in "pmbootstrap init" by default.
Move the device package to unmaintained to implement that.
Also, add an "# Unmaintained: ..." comment that will be displayed
in "pmbootstrap init" if the device is selected anyway.
