Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oliver Smith
dd32a6697b
main/postmarketos-welcome: upgrade to 0.7.0 (MR 3441)
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
2022-09-15 09:35:27 +02:00
Martijn Braam
751f109220
main/postmarketos-welcome: upgrade to 0.6.0 (MR 3392) 2022-08-31 16:57:43 +02:00
Oliver Smith
3a964003e7
main/postmarketos-welcome: upgrade to 0.5.1 (MR 3249) 2022-06-29 07:59:20 +02:00
Oliver Smith
bd5fe72ccf
main/postmarketos-welcome: upgrade to 0.5.0 (MR 3226) 2022-06-12 13:01:06 +02:00
Oliver Smith
8c933ef9a0
main/postmarketos-welcome: upgrade to 0.4.2 (MR 3208) 2022-06-10 10:01:09 +02:00
Pablo Correa Gómez
bec9861ec4
main/postmarketos-welcome: version provides (MR 3208)
There was lately a discussion upstream due to apk 2.12.10 breaking
some packages in aports[1]. The conclusion in IRC is that provides
were designed to be either versioned or have a provider_priority.
Otherwise, the provides will be treated as a "virtual package".
Which is not what we want here.

[1] https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/apk-tools/-/issues/10847
2022-06-10 10:01:04 +02:00
Oliver Smith
5eeb86a419
main/postmarketos-welcome: upgrade to 4.0.0 (MR 3207)
[ci:skip-vercheck]: postmarketos-ui-phosh change in _pmb_recommends
doesn't need a version bump
2022-06-08 01:23:50 +02:00