Remove maintainers who could not be reached to test v22.12. Add exkc as
maintainer for firmware-pine64-rockpro64 as discussed in review of this
patch.
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
[ci:ignore-count]
[ci:skip-vercheck] needed for the postmarketos-ui-* packages in this
series
[ci:skip-build] already built ui-* packages in CI, and device pacakges
are just trivial deviceinfo change (manually built some just to verify)
As of MR 2039, the kernel modules are now stripped (INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1).
It turns out that this massively reduces their size so that including
the panel + touchscreen modules in the initfs still fits into the boot
partition. This allows the splash screen and osk-sdl to work correctly.
Alpine's abuild is soon going to complain if an APKBUILD has more than
one "Maintainer:" listed. Work around it by renaming the additional
maintainers to "Co-Maintainer:". While at it, move the devicepkg reference
link to the top in device-xiaomi-santoni for consistency.
In postmarketOS, we require at least two maintainers for devices in
main, therefore it does not make sense to drop additional maintainers
from the file.
In Alpine, this change was made because pkgs.alpinelinux.org apparently
can't handle more than one maintainer. I looked into it, and it would
require a database change to add it there, so it does not seem worth the
effort. I also thought about extending abuild to add an environment
variable to skip the check, but then the package would not build with
plain abuild without using the env var.
Related: dd4cd9d606
[ci:skip-build] [ci:skip-vercheck]
I cannot test on most of them (at the moment), but I was involved
in porting all of them so I could "guess" certain changes at least.
[ci:skip-vercheck]: just moved and some maintainers
