Right now the "bq-picmt" device port is quite confusing.
It's actually for the same device as "bq-paella", which is in community
and uses the mainline kernel, except that it uses the downstream kernel.
Having the downstream kernel packaged is useful for testing sometimes,
but otherwise the device package is completely unsupported.
The mainline port works much better. The downstream port should only
be used if you know what you are doing (e.g. because you want to test
if something is working on downstream but not mainline) and therefore
it should not show up in "pmbootstrap init" by default.
Move the device package to unmaintained to implement that.
Also, add an "# Unmaintained: ..." comment that will be displayed
in "pmbootstrap init" if the device is selected anyway.
Mostly the GCC10 yylloc failure was seen but several others have been
observed:
* wireguard script was silently failing
* several gcc10 x86 errors
* a checksum from kernel.org has changed
Now we have 3 different gcc10 yylloc patches:
gcc10-extern_YYLOC_global_declaration.patch:
Linux < 4.2
linux4.2-gcc10-extern_YYLOC_global_declaration.patch:
Linux 4.2+
linux4.17-gcc10-extern_YYLOC_global_declaration.patch:
Linux 4.17+
[ci:skip-build]
[ci:ignore-count]
[ci:skip-vercheck]
At the moment we have Contributor: lines on some packages (but not all of them),
but often they don't represent the actual contributors to the package very well.
E.g. when we added them retroactively to the device packages we only added
the initial contributor (which isn't necessarily the person
who made most of the work for a device...)
The Git history is the most representative source for figuring out
who contributed to a package, so there is no reason to duplicate that
into the APKBUILD.
[skip ci]: way too many packages
