cross/binutils-*: upgrade to 2.39-r1

cross/binutils-aarch64/APKBUILD

@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 # Based on: main/binutils
 
 pkgname=binutils-aarch64
-pkgver=2.38
+pkgver=2.39
-pkgrel=4
+pkgrel=1
 pkgdesc="Tools necessary to build programs for aarch64 targets"
 url="https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/"
 makedepends="gettext libtool autoconf automake bison texinfo"
@@ -16,11 +16,6 @@ source="https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-$pkgver.tar.xz
 	ld-bfd-mips.patch
 	0001-Revert-PR25882-.gnu.attributes-are-not-checked-for-s.patch
 	binutils-mips-disable-assert.patch
-	binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch
-	binutils-s390x-1.patch
-	binutils-s390x-2.patch
-	binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch
-	binutils-clang-dwarf-5.patch
 	"
 builddir="$srcdir/binutils-$pkgver"
 
@@ -76,15 +71,10 @@ package() {
 
 
 sha512sums="
-8bf0b0d193c9c010e0518ee2b2e5a830898af206510992483b427477ed178396cd210235e85fd7bd99a96fc6d5eedbeccbd48317a10f752b7336ada8b2bb826d  binutils-2.38.tar.xz
+68e038f339a8c21faa19a57bbc447a51c817f47c2e06d740847c6e9cc3396c025d35d5369fa8c3f8b70414757c89f0e577939ddc0d70f283182504920f53b0a3  binutils-2.39.tar.xz
 ecee33b0e435aa704af1c334e560f201638ff79e199aa11ed78a72f7c9b46f85fbb227af5748e735fd681d1965fcc42ac81b0c8824e540430ce0c706c81e8b49  binutils-ld-fix-static-linking.patch
 f55cf2e0bf82f97583a1abe10710e4013ecf7d64f1da2ef8659a44a06d0dd8beaf58dab98a183488ea137f03e32d62efc878d95f018f836f8cec870bc448556f  gold-mips.patch
 314d2ef9071c89940aa6c8118e8a1e2f191a5d0a4bf596da1ad9cc84f884d8bc7dea8bd7b9fc3f8f1bddd3fd41c6eb017e1e804044b3bf084df1ed9e6e095e2d  ld-bfd-mips.patch
 70ec22bd72ef6dddecfd970613387dd4a8cdc8730dd3cbf03d5a0c3a7c4d839383167bb06dad21bf7c235329fd44b5dc4aefe762f68544f17155cf002bf1be4a  0001-Revert-PR25882-.gnu.attributes-are-not-checked-for-s.patch
 609cd90d8b334eb309f586b17b9d335a08d3dbb6def7c3eb5c010028fcb681674031e5b9d853aa7a39a50304356a86afc184b85562b3f228f8197f4d29395c8f  binutils-mips-disable-assert.patch
-27ea91e0e406e2ed464fd692cf92a07e338781789f2d968c8b95d9d5545985056a6f7f500df3952e5ab42165db28b741aa33d6b717e880b11a2e41fe406b13c4  binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch
-a9efe2689624865f0ff33d4776a5bd295bcad6484bdd38d0ca490fea43691c4933ab33d17478851998eef12922dbf83d6c3225bb1f8faf92a1367d086390f7d3  binutils-s390x-1.patch
-0e291df80ad279005265634014d0935d2c115a5ed708d25407094b7ad4ddf267d1fb7fcbcb2d9ad73bd305b4e3974628b820bd1f249f56c095e4896872434cc9  binutils-s390x-2.patch
-63e58f45df3570279cb1ee5215ba3de77de012cac20da9cdd23f86a93890056e1efa397521559cfd0716d5239604607c440d8f4d089d83c98b8fbc1b5c5305f8  binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch
-d76e998cdb68e6beb56ebb5856b1617acb09478596f7a114257e0d027d72be7e408468f83ea023d8cc93e400d9b4e7da0a21b046db70b76fdfeffd4b020a386d  binutils-clang-dwarf-5.patch
 "

cross/binutils-aarch64/binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-Fix for DARN opcode error during ppc64le compilation of rng-tools which
-occurs with binutils 2.38 but not with binutils 2.37..
-
-https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=cebc89b9328;hp=9cbed90ee623d75e31994e7943960c997ba565f2
-
-
-diff -aur a/gas/config/tc-ppc.c b/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
---- a/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
-+++ b/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
-@@ -5965,7 +5965,30 @@
- 	     options do not count as a new machine, instead they add
- 	     to currently selected opcodes.  */
- 	  ppc_cpu_t machine_sticky = 0;
--	  new_cpu = ppc_parse_cpu (ppc_cpu, &machine_sticky, cpu_string);
-+	  /* Unfortunately, some versions of gcc emit a .machine
-+	     directive very near the start of the compiler's assembly
-+	     output file.  This is bad because it overrides user -Wa
-+	     cpu selection.  Worse, there are versions of gcc that
-+	     emit the *wrong* cpu, not even respecting the -mcpu given
-+	     to gcc.  See gcc pr101393.  And to compound the problem,
-+	     as of 20220222 gcc doesn't pass the correct cpu option to
-+	     gas on the command line.  See gcc pr59828.  Hack around
-+	     this by keeping sticky options for an early .machine.  */
-+	  asection *sec;
-+	  for (sec = stdoutput->sections; sec != NULL; sec = sec->next)
-+	    {
-+	      segment_info_type *info = seg_info (sec);
-+	      /* Are the frags for this section perturbed from their
-+	         initial state?  Even .align will count here.  */
-+	      if (info != NULL
-+	          && (info->frchainP->frch_root != info->frchainP->frch_last
-+	              || info->frchainP->frch_root->fr_type != rs_fill
-+	              || info->frchainP->frch_root->fr_fix != 0))
-+	        break;
-+	    }
-+	  new_cpu = ppc_parse_cpu (ppc_cpu,
-+	                           sec == NULL ? &sticky : &machine_sticky,
-+	                           cpu_string);
- 	  if (new_cpu != 0)
- 	    ppc_cpu = new_cpu;
- 	  else

cross/binutils-aarch64/binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-From 97dd8079feb35456d7b387a594b5e00f7654b3b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:50:30 +0930
-Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC64: fix assertion in ppc_build_one_stub with -Os code
-
-save_res stubs aren't written in ppc_build_one_stub, their offsets
-(which are zero) should not be checked.
-
-	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc_build_one_stub): Don't check save_res offsets.
-
-(cherry picked from commit 570e911f4e533fad33ad5e4e1102929cf7e80bd7)
----
- bfd/elf64-ppc.c | 3 ++-
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-index cb12ed476d8..df503341fe9 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-@@ -11700,7 +11700,8 @@ ppc_build_one_stub (struct bfd_hash_entry *gen_entry, void *in_arg)
-   if (htab == NULL)
-     return false;
- 
--  BFD_ASSERT (stub_entry->stub_offset >= stub_entry->group->stub_sec->size);
-+  BFD_ASSERT (stub_entry->stub_offset >= stub_entry->group->stub_sec->size
-+	      || stub_entry->type.main == ppc_stub_save_res);
-   loc = stub_entry->group->stub_sec->contents + stub_entry->stub_offset;
- 
-   htab->stub_count[stub_entry->type.main - 1] += 1;
--- 
-2.31.1
-

cross/binutils-aarch64/binutils-s390x-1.patch

@@ -1,147 +0,0 @@
-From 82a5bb730a16f8c7962568030268e784b4fb42c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:29:58 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] s390: Avoid dynamic TLS relocs in PIE
-
-No dynamic relocs are needed for TLS defined in an executable, the
-TP relative offset is known at link time.
-
-Fixes
-FAIL: Build pr22263-1
-
-bfd/
-	PR ld/22263
-	* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_tls_transition): Use bfd_link_dll
-	instead of bfd_link_pic for TLS.
-	(elf_s390_check_relocs): Likewise.
-	(allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise.
-	(elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
-
-(cherry picked from commit 26b1426577b5dcb32d149c64cca3e603b81948a9)
----
- bfd/elf64-s390.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-s390.c b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-index e780efa7181..00ee386baab 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ elf_s390_tls_transition (struct bfd_link_info *info,
- 			 int r_type,
- 			 int is_local)
- {
--  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
-     return r_type;
- 
-   switch (r_type)
-@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ elf_s390_check_relocs (bfd *abfd,
- 	case R_390_TLS_GOTIE20:
- 	case R_390_TLS_GOTIE64:
- 	case R_390_TLS_IEENT:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    info->flags |= DF_STATIC_TLS;
- 	  /* Fall through */
- 
-@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ elf_s390_check_relocs (bfd *abfd,
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LE64 && bfd_link_pie (info))
- 	    break;
- 
--	  if (!bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (!bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    break;
- 	  info->flags |= DF_STATIC_TLS;
- 	  /* Fall through */
-@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h,
-      to R_390_TLS_LE64 requiring no TLS entry. For GOTIE12 and IEENT
-      we can save the dynamic TLS relocation.  */
-   if (h->got.refcount > 0
--      && !bfd_link_pic (info)
-+      && !bfd_link_dll (info)
-       && h->dynindx == -1
-       && elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-     {
-@@ -2662,7 +2662,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 
- 	  /* Relocations for tls literal pool entries.  */
- 	case R_390_TLS_IE64:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    {
- 	      Elf_Internal_Rela outrel;
- 	      asection *sreloc;
-@@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  else if (h != NULL)
- 	    {
- 	      tls_type = elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && h->dynindx == -1 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && h->dynindx == -1 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
- 		r_type = R_390_TLS_LE64;
- 	    }
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_GD64 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-@@ -2801,14 +2801,14 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	      if (local_got_offsets == NULL)
- 		abort();
- 	      off = local_got_offsets[r_symndx];
--	      if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	      if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 		goto emit_tls_relocs;
- 	    }
- 	  else
- 	    {
- 	      off = h->got.offset;
- 	      tls_type = elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
--	      if (bfd_link_pic (info) || h->dynindx != -1 || tls_type < GOT_TLS_IE)
-+	      if (bfd_link_dll (info) || h->dynindx != -1 || tls_type < GOT_TLS_IE)
- 		goto emit_tls_relocs;
- 	    }
- 
-@@ -2825,7 +2825,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  break;
- 
- 	case R_390_TLS_LDM64:
--	  if (! bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (! bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    /* The literal pool entry this relocation refers to gets ignored
- 	       by the optimized code of the local exec model. Do nothing
- 	       and the value will turn out zero.  */
-@@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  continue;
- 
- 	case R_390_TLS_LDO64:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info) || (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info) || (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING))
- 	    relocation -= dtpoff_base (info);
- 	  else
- 	    /* When converting LDO to LE, we must negate.  */
-@@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LOAD)
- 	    {
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
- 		{
- 		  /* IE->LE transition. Four valid cases:
- 		     lg %rx,(0,%ry)    -> sllg %rx,%ry,0
-@@ -2972,7 +2972,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 		  invalid_tls_insn (input_bfd, input_section, rel);
- 		  return false;
- 		}
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
- 		{
- 		  /* GD->LE transition.
- 		     brasl %r14,__tls_get_addr@plt -> brcl 0,. */
-@@ -2991,7 +2991,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	    }
- 	  else if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LDCALL)
- 	    {
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info))
- 		{
- 		  unsigned int insn0, insn1;
- 
--- 
-2.27.0
-

cross/binutils-aarch64/binutils-s390x-2.patch

@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-From 9a01457e02e7bb594ff9a9ac62a38c909e2e3083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:30:55 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] s390: Add DT_JMPREL pointing to .rela.[i]plt with static-pie
-
-In static-pie case, there are IRELATIVE-relocs in
-.rela.iplt (htab->irelplt), which will later be grouped
-to .rela.plt.  On s390, the IRELATIVE relocations are
-always located in .rela.iplt - even for non-static case.
-Ensure that DT_JMPREL, DT_PLTRELA, DT_PLTRELASZ is added
-to the dynamic section even if htab->srelplt->size == 0.
-See _bfd_elf_add_dynamic_tags in bfd/elflink.c.
-
-bfd/
-	elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_size_dynamic_sections):
-	Enforce DT_JMPREL via htab->elf.dt_jmprel_required.
-
-(cherry picked from commit d942d8db12adf4c9e5c7d9ed6496a779ece7149e)
----
- bfd/elf64-s390.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-s390.c b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-index 00ee386baab..0b851f7ac0e 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-@@ -1876,7 +1876,20 @@ elf_s390_size_dynamic_sections (bfd *output_bfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
-       else if (startswith (bfd_section_name (s), ".rela"))
- 	{
- 	  if (s->size != 0 && s != htab->elf.srelplt)
--	    relocs = true;
-+	    {
-+	      relocs = true;
-+	      if (s == htab->elf.irelplt)
-+		{
-+		  /* In static-pie case, there are IRELATIVE-relocs in
-+		     .rela.iplt (htab->irelplt), which will later be grouped
-+		     to .rela.plt.  On s390, the IRELATIVE relocations are
-+		     always located in .rela.iplt - even for non-static case.
-+		     Ensure that DT_JMPREL, DT_PLTRELA, DT_PLTRELASZ is added
-+		     to the dynamic section even if htab->srelplt->size == 0.
-+		     See _bfd_elf_add_dynamic_tags in bfd/elflink.c.  */
-+		  htab->elf.dt_jmprel_required = true;
-+		}
-+	    }
- 
- 	  /* We use the reloc_count field as a counter if we need
- 	     to copy relocs into the output file.  */
--- 
-2.27.0
-

cross/binutils-armhf/APKBUILD

@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 # Based on: main/binutils
 
 pkgname=binutils-armhf
-pkgver=2.38
+pkgver=2.39
-pkgrel=4
+pkgrel=1
 pkgdesc="Tools necessary to build programs for armhf targets"
 url="https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/"
 makedepends="gettext libtool autoconf automake bison texinfo"
@@ -16,11 +16,6 @@ source="https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-$pkgver.tar.xz
 	ld-bfd-mips.patch
 	0001-Revert-PR25882-.gnu.attributes-are-not-checked-for-s.patch
 	binutils-mips-disable-assert.patch
-	binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch
-	binutils-s390x-1.patch
-	binutils-s390x-2.patch
-	binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch
-	binutils-clang-dwarf-5.patch
 	"
 builddir="$srcdir/binutils-$pkgver"
 
@@ -76,15 +71,10 @@ package() {
 
 
 sha512sums="
-8bf0b0d193c9c010e0518ee2b2e5a830898af206510992483b427477ed178396cd210235e85fd7bd99a96fc6d5eedbeccbd48317a10f752b7336ada8b2bb826d  binutils-2.38.tar.xz
+68e038f339a8c21faa19a57bbc447a51c817f47c2e06d740847c6e9cc3396c025d35d5369fa8c3f8b70414757c89f0e577939ddc0d70f283182504920f53b0a3  binutils-2.39.tar.xz
 ecee33b0e435aa704af1c334e560f201638ff79e199aa11ed78a72f7c9b46f85fbb227af5748e735fd681d1965fcc42ac81b0c8824e540430ce0c706c81e8b49  binutils-ld-fix-static-linking.patch
 f55cf2e0bf82f97583a1abe10710e4013ecf7d64f1da2ef8659a44a06d0dd8beaf58dab98a183488ea137f03e32d62efc878d95f018f836f8cec870bc448556f  gold-mips.patch
 314d2ef9071c89940aa6c8118e8a1e2f191a5d0a4bf596da1ad9cc84f884d8bc7dea8bd7b9fc3f8f1bddd3fd41c6eb017e1e804044b3bf084df1ed9e6e095e2d  ld-bfd-mips.patch
 70ec22bd72ef6dddecfd970613387dd4a8cdc8730dd3cbf03d5a0c3a7c4d839383167bb06dad21bf7c235329fd44b5dc4aefe762f68544f17155cf002bf1be4a  0001-Revert-PR25882-.gnu.attributes-are-not-checked-for-s.patch
 609cd90d8b334eb309f586b17b9d335a08d3dbb6def7c3eb5c010028fcb681674031e5b9d853aa7a39a50304356a86afc184b85562b3f228f8197f4d29395c8f  binutils-mips-disable-assert.patch
-27ea91e0e406e2ed464fd692cf92a07e338781789f2d968c8b95d9d5545985056a6f7f500df3952e5ab42165db28b741aa33d6b717e880b11a2e41fe406b13c4  binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch
-a9efe2689624865f0ff33d4776a5bd295bcad6484bdd38d0ca490fea43691c4933ab33d17478851998eef12922dbf83d6c3225bb1f8faf92a1367d086390f7d3  binutils-s390x-1.patch
-0e291df80ad279005265634014d0935d2c115a5ed708d25407094b7ad4ddf267d1fb7fcbcb2d9ad73bd305b4e3974628b820bd1f249f56c095e4896872434cc9  binutils-s390x-2.patch
-63e58f45df3570279cb1ee5215ba3de77de012cac20da9cdd23f86a93890056e1efa397521559cfd0716d5239604607c440d8f4d089d83c98b8fbc1b5c5305f8  binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch
-d76e998cdb68e6beb56ebb5856b1617acb09478596f7a114257e0d027d72be7e408468f83ea023d8cc93e400d9b4e7da0a21b046db70b76fdfeffd4b020a386d  binutils-clang-dwarf-5.patch
 "

cross/binutils-armhf/binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-Fix for DARN opcode error during ppc64le compilation of rng-tools which
-occurs with binutils 2.38 but not with binutils 2.37..
-
-https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=cebc89b9328;hp=9cbed90ee623d75e31994e7943960c997ba565f2
-
-
-diff -aur a/gas/config/tc-ppc.c b/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
---- a/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
-+++ b/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
-@@ -5965,7 +5965,30 @@
- 	     options do not count as a new machine, instead they add
- 	     to currently selected opcodes.  */
- 	  ppc_cpu_t machine_sticky = 0;
--	  new_cpu = ppc_parse_cpu (ppc_cpu, &machine_sticky, cpu_string);
-+	  /* Unfortunately, some versions of gcc emit a .machine
-+	     directive very near the start of the compiler's assembly
-+	     output file.  This is bad because it overrides user -Wa
-+	     cpu selection.  Worse, there are versions of gcc that
-+	     emit the *wrong* cpu, not even respecting the -mcpu given
-+	     to gcc.  See gcc pr101393.  And to compound the problem,
-+	     as of 20220222 gcc doesn't pass the correct cpu option to
-+	     gas on the command line.  See gcc pr59828.  Hack around
-+	     this by keeping sticky options for an early .machine.  */
-+	  asection *sec;
-+	  for (sec = stdoutput->sections; sec != NULL; sec = sec->next)
-+	    {
-+	      segment_info_type *info = seg_info (sec);
-+	      /* Are the frags for this section perturbed from their
-+	         initial state?  Even .align will count here.  */
-+	      if (info != NULL
-+	          && (info->frchainP->frch_root != info->frchainP->frch_last
-+	              || info->frchainP->frch_root->fr_type != rs_fill
-+	              || info->frchainP->frch_root->fr_fix != 0))
-+	        break;
-+	    }
-+	  new_cpu = ppc_parse_cpu (ppc_cpu,
-+	                           sec == NULL ? &sticky : &machine_sticky,
-+	                           cpu_string);
- 	  if (new_cpu != 0)
- 	    ppc_cpu = new_cpu;
- 	  else

cross/binutils-armhf/binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-From 97dd8079feb35456d7b387a594b5e00f7654b3b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:50:30 +0930
-Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC64: fix assertion in ppc_build_one_stub with -Os code
-
-save_res stubs aren't written in ppc_build_one_stub, their offsets
-(which are zero) should not be checked.
-
-	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc_build_one_stub): Don't check save_res offsets.
-
-(cherry picked from commit 570e911f4e533fad33ad5e4e1102929cf7e80bd7)
----
- bfd/elf64-ppc.c | 3 ++-
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-index cb12ed476d8..df503341fe9 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-@@ -11700,7 +11700,8 @@ ppc_build_one_stub (struct bfd_hash_entry *gen_entry, void *in_arg)
-   if (htab == NULL)
-     return false;
- 
--  BFD_ASSERT (stub_entry->stub_offset >= stub_entry->group->stub_sec->size);
-+  BFD_ASSERT (stub_entry->stub_offset >= stub_entry->group->stub_sec->size
-+	      || stub_entry->type.main == ppc_stub_save_res);
-   loc = stub_entry->group->stub_sec->contents + stub_entry->stub_offset;
- 
-   htab->stub_count[stub_entry->type.main - 1] += 1;
--- 
-2.31.1
-

cross/binutils-armhf/binutils-s390x-1.patch

@@ -1,147 +0,0 @@
-From 82a5bb730a16f8c7962568030268e784b4fb42c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:29:58 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] s390: Avoid dynamic TLS relocs in PIE
-
-No dynamic relocs are needed for TLS defined in an executable, the
-TP relative offset is known at link time.
-
-Fixes
-FAIL: Build pr22263-1
-
-bfd/
-	PR ld/22263
-	* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_tls_transition): Use bfd_link_dll
-	instead of bfd_link_pic for TLS.
-	(elf_s390_check_relocs): Likewise.
-	(allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise.
-	(elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
-
-(cherry picked from commit 26b1426577b5dcb32d149c64cca3e603b81948a9)
----
- bfd/elf64-s390.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-s390.c b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-index e780efa7181..00ee386baab 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ elf_s390_tls_transition (struct bfd_link_info *info,
- 			 int r_type,
- 			 int is_local)
- {
--  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
-     return r_type;
- 
-   switch (r_type)
-@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ elf_s390_check_relocs (bfd *abfd,
- 	case R_390_TLS_GOTIE20:
- 	case R_390_TLS_GOTIE64:
- 	case R_390_TLS_IEENT:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    info->flags |= DF_STATIC_TLS;
- 	  /* Fall through */
- 
-@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ elf_s390_check_relocs (bfd *abfd,
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LE64 && bfd_link_pie (info))
- 	    break;
- 
--	  if (!bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (!bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    break;
- 	  info->flags |= DF_STATIC_TLS;
- 	  /* Fall through */
-@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h,
-      to R_390_TLS_LE64 requiring no TLS entry. For GOTIE12 and IEENT
-      we can save the dynamic TLS relocation.  */
-   if (h->got.refcount > 0
--      && !bfd_link_pic (info)
-+      && !bfd_link_dll (info)
-       && h->dynindx == -1
-       && elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-     {
-@@ -2662,7 +2662,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 
- 	  /* Relocations for tls literal pool entries.  */
- 	case R_390_TLS_IE64:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    {
- 	      Elf_Internal_Rela outrel;
- 	      asection *sreloc;
-@@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  else if (h != NULL)
- 	    {
- 	      tls_type = elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && h->dynindx == -1 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && h->dynindx == -1 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
- 		r_type = R_390_TLS_LE64;
- 	    }
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_GD64 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-@@ -2801,14 +2801,14 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	      if (local_got_offsets == NULL)
- 		abort();
- 	      off = local_got_offsets[r_symndx];
--	      if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	      if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 		goto emit_tls_relocs;
- 	    }
- 	  else
- 	    {
- 	      off = h->got.offset;
- 	      tls_type = elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
--	      if (bfd_link_pic (info) || h->dynindx != -1 || tls_type < GOT_TLS_IE)
-+	      if (bfd_link_dll (info) || h->dynindx != -1 || tls_type < GOT_TLS_IE)
- 		goto emit_tls_relocs;
- 	    }
- 
-@@ -2825,7 +2825,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  break;
- 
- 	case R_390_TLS_LDM64:
--	  if (! bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (! bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    /* The literal pool entry this relocation refers to gets ignored
- 	       by the optimized code of the local exec model. Do nothing
- 	       and the value will turn out zero.  */
-@@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  continue;
- 
- 	case R_390_TLS_LDO64:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info) || (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info) || (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING))
- 	    relocation -= dtpoff_base (info);
- 	  else
- 	    /* When converting LDO to LE, we must negate.  */
-@@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LOAD)
- 	    {
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
- 		{
- 		  /* IE->LE transition. Four valid cases:
- 		     lg %rx,(0,%ry)    -> sllg %rx,%ry,0
-@@ -2972,7 +2972,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 		  invalid_tls_insn (input_bfd, input_section, rel);
- 		  return false;
- 		}
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
- 		{
- 		  /* GD->LE transition.
- 		     brasl %r14,__tls_get_addr@plt -> brcl 0,. */
-@@ -2991,7 +2991,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	    }
- 	  else if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LDCALL)
- 	    {
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info))
- 		{
- 		  unsigned int insn0, insn1;
- 
--- 
-2.27.0
-

cross/binutils-armhf/binutils-s390x-2.patch

@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-From 9a01457e02e7bb594ff9a9ac62a38c909e2e3083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:30:55 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] s390: Add DT_JMPREL pointing to .rela.[i]plt with static-pie
-
-In static-pie case, there are IRELATIVE-relocs in
-.rela.iplt (htab->irelplt), which will later be grouped
-to .rela.plt.  On s390, the IRELATIVE relocations are
-always located in .rela.iplt - even for non-static case.
-Ensure that DT_JMPREL, DT_PLTRELA, DT_PLTRELASZ is added
-to the dynamic section even if htab->srelplt->size == 0.
-See _bfd_elf_add_dynamic_tags in bfd/elflink.c.
-
-bfd/
-	elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_size_dynamic_sections):
-	Enforce DT_JMPREL via htab->elf.dt_jmprel_required.
-
-(cherry picked from commit d942d8db12adf4c9e5c7d9ed6496a779ece7149e)
----
- bfd/elf64-s390.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-s390.c b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-index 00ee386baab..0b851f7ac0e 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-@@ -1876,7 +1876,20 @@ elf_s390_size_dynamic_sections (bfd *output_bfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
-       else if (startswith (bfd_section_name (s), ".rela"))
- 	{
- 	  if (s->size != 0 && s != htab->elf.srelplt)
--	    relocs = true;
-+	    {
-+	      relocs = true;
-+	      if (s == htab->elf.irelplt)
-+		{
-+		  /* In static-pie case, there are IRELATIVE-relocs in
-+		     .rela.iplt (htab->irelplt), which will later be grouped
-+		     to .rela.plt.  On s390, the IRELATIVE relocations are
-+		     always located in .rela.iplt - even for non-static case.
-+		     Ensure that DT_JMPREL, DT_PLTRELA, DT_PLTRELASZ is added
-+		     to the dynamic section even if htab->srelplt->size == 0.
-+		     See _bfd_elf_add_dynamic_tags in bfd/elflink.c.  */
-+		  htab->elf.dt_jmprel_required = true;
-+		}
-+	    }
- 
- 	  /* We use the reloc_count field as a counter if we need
- 	     to copy relocs into the output file.  */
--- 
-2.27.0
-

cross/binutils-armv7/APKBUILD

@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 # Based on: main/binutils
 
 pkgname=binutils-armv7
-pkgver=2.38
+pkgver=2.39
-pkgrel=4
+pkgrel=1
 pkgdesc="Tools necessary to build programs for armv7 targets"
 url="https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/"
 makedepends="gettext libtool autoconf automake bison texinfo"
@@ -16,11 +16,6 @@ source="https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-$pkgver.tar.xz
 	ld-bfd-mips.patch
 	0001-Revert-PR25882-.gnu.attributes-are-not-checked-for-s.patch
 	binutils-mips-disable-assert.patch
-	binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch
-	binutils-s390x-1.patch
-	binutils-s390x-2.patch
-	binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch
-	binutils-clang-dwarf-5.patch
 	"
 builddir="$srcdir/binutils-$pkgver"
 
@@ -76,15 +71,10 @@ package() {
 
 
 sha512sums="
-8bf0b0d193c9c010e0518ee2b2e5a830898af206510992483b427477ed178396cd210235e85fd7bd99a96fc6d5eedbeccbd48317a10f752b7336ada8b2bb826d  binutils-2.38.tar.xz
+68e038f339a8c21faa19a57bbc447a51c817f47c2e06d740847c6e9cc3396c025d35d5369fa8c3f8b70414757c89f0e577939ddc0d70f283182504920f53b0a3  binutils-2.39.tar.xz
 ecee33b0e435aa704af1c334e560f201638ff79e199aa11ed78a72f7c9b46f85fbb227af5748e735fd681d1965fcc42ac81b0c8824e540430ce0c706c81e8b49  binutils-ld-fix-static-linking.patch
 f55cf2e0bf82f97583a1abe10710e4013ecf7d64f1da2ef8659a44a06d0dd8beaf58dab98a183488ea137f03e32d62efc878d95f018f836f8cec870bc448556f  gold-mips.patch
 314d2ef9071c89940aa6c8118e8a1e2f191a5d0a4bf596da1ad9cc84f884d8bc7dea8bd7b9fc3f8f1bddd3fd41c6eb017e1e804044b3bf084df1ed9e6e095e2d  ld-bfd-mips.patch
 70ec22bd72ef6dddecfd970613387dd4a8cdc8730dd3cbf03d5a0c3a7c4d839383167bb06dad21bf7c235329fd44b5dc4aefe762f68544f17155cf002bf1be4a  0001-Revert-PR25882-.gnu.attributes-are-not-checked-for-s.patch
 609cd90d8b334eb309f586b17b9d335a08d3dbb6def7c3eb5c010028fcb681674031e5b9d853aa7a39a50304356a86afc184b85562b3f228f8197f4d29395c8f  binutils-mips-disable-assert.patch
-27ea91e0e406e2ed464fd692cf92a07e338781789f2d968c8b95d9d5545985056a6f7f500df3952e5ab42165db28b741aa33d6b717e880b11a2e41fe406b13c4  binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch
-a9efe2689624865f0ff33d4776a5bd295bcad6484bdd38d0ca490fea43691c4933ab33d17478851998eef12922dbf83d6c3225bb1f8faf92a1367d086390f7d3  binutils-s390x-1.patch
-0e291df80ad279005265634014d0935d2c115a5ed708d25407094b7ad4ddf267d1fb7fcbcb2d9ad73bd305b4e3974628b820bd1f249f56c095e4896872434cc9  binutils-s390x-2.patch
-63e58f45df3570279cb1ee5215ba3de77de012cac20da9cdd23f86a93890056e1efa397521559cfd0716d5239604607c440d8f4d089d83c98b8fbc1b5c5305f8  binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch
-d76e998cdb68e6beb56ebb5856b1617acb09478596f7a114257e0d027d72be7e408468f83ea023d8cc93e400d9b4e7da0a21b046db70b76fdfeffd4b020a386d  binutils-clang-dwarf-5.patch
 "

cross/binutils-armv7/binutils-ppc-fix-machine-options.patch

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-Fix for DARN opcode error during ppc64le compilation of rng-tools which
-occurs with binutils 2.38 but not with binutils 2.37..
-
-https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=cebc89b9328;hp=9cbed90ee623d75e31994e7943960c997ba565f2
-
-
-diff -aur a/gas/config/tc-ppc.c b/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
---- a/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
-+++ b/gas/config/tc-ppc.c
-@@ -5965,7 +5965,30 @@
- 	     options do not count as a new machine, instead they add
- 	     to currently selected opcodes.  */
- 	  ppc_cpu_t machine_sticky = 0;
--	  new_cpu = ppc_parse_cpu (ppc_cpu, &machine_sticky, cpu_string);
-+	  /* Unfortunately, some versions of gcc emit a .machine
-+	     directive very near the start of the compiler's assembly
-+	     output file.  This is bad because it overrides user -Wa
-+	     cpu selection.  Worse, there are versions of gcc that
-+	     emit the *wrong* cpu, not even respecting the -mcpu given
-+	     to gcc.  See gcc pr101393.  And to compound the problem,
-+	     as of 20220222 gcc doesn't pass the correct cpu option to
-+	     gas on the command line.  See gcc pr59828.  Hack around
-+	     this by keeping sticky options for an early .machine.  */
-+	  asection *sec;
-+	  for (sec = stdoutput->sections; sec != NULL; sec = sec->next)
-+	    {
-+	      segment_info_type *info = seg_info (sec);
-+	      /* Are the frags for this section perturbed from their
-+	         initial state?  Even .align will count here.  */
-+	      if (info != NULL
-+	          && (info->frchainP->frch_root != info->frchainP->frch_last
-+	              || info->frchainP->frch_root->fr_type != rs_fill
-+	              || info->frchainP->frch_root->fr_fix != 0))
-+	        break;
-+	    }
-+	  new_cpu = ppc_parse_cpu (ppc_cpu,
-+	                           sec == NULL ? &sticky : &machine_sticky,
-+	                           cpu_string);
- 	  if (new_cpu != 0)
- 	    ppc_cpu = new_cpu;
- 	  else

cross/binutils-armv7/binutils-ppc64le-assertion.patch

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-From 97dd8079feb35456d7b387a594b5e00f7654b3b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:50:30 +0930
-Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC64: fix assertion in ppc_build_one_stub with -Os code
-
-save_res stubs aren't written in ppc_build_one_stub, their offsets
-(which are zero) should not be checked.
-
-	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc_build_one_stub): Don't check save_res offsets.
-
-(cherry picked from commit 570e911f4e533fad33ad5e4e1102929cf7e80bd7)
----
- bfd/elf64-ppc.c | 3 ++-
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-index cb12ed476d8..df503341fe9 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-@@ -11700,7 +11700,8 @@ ppc_build_one_stub (struct bfd_hash_entry *gen_entry, void *in_arg)
-   if (htab == NULL)
-     return false;
- 
--  BFD_ASSERT (stub_entry->stub_offset >= stub_entry->group->stub_sec->size);
-+  BFD_ASSERT (stub_entry->stub_offset >= stub_entry->group->stub_sec->size
-+	      || stub_entry->type.main == ppc_stub_save_res);
-   loc = stub_entry->group->stub_sec->contents + stub_entry->stub_offset;
- 
-   htab->stub_count[stub_entry->type.main - 1] += 1;
--- 
-2.31.1
-

cross/binutils-armv7/binutils-s390x-1.patch

@@ -1,147 +0,0 @@
-From 82a5bb730a16f8c7962568030268e784b4fb42c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:29:58 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] s390: Avoid dynamic TLS relocs in PIE
-
-No dynamic relocs are needed for TLS defined in an executable, the
-TP relative offset is known at link time.
-
-Fixes
-FAIL: Build pr22263-1
-
-bfd/
-	PR ld/22263
-	* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_tls_transition): Use bfd_link_dll
-	instead of bfd_link_pic for TLS.
-	(elf_s390_check_relocs): Likewise.
-	(allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise.
-	(elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
-
-(cherry picked from commit 26b1426577b5dcb32d149c64cca3e603b81948a9)
----
- bfd/elf64-s390.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-s390.c b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-index e780efa7181..00ee386baab 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ elf_s390_tls_transition (struct bfd_link_info *info,
- 			 int r_type,
- 			 int is_local)
- {
--  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
-     return r_type;
- 
-   switch (r_type)
-@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ elf_s390_check_relocs (bfd *abfd,
- 	case R_390_TLS_GOTIE20:
- 	case R_390_TLS_GOTIE64:
- 	case R_390_TLS_IEENT:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    info->flags |= DF_STATIC_TLS;
- 	  /* Fall through */
- 
-@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ elf_s390_check_relocs (bfd *abfd,
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LE64 && bfd_link_pie (info))
- 	    break;
- 
--	  if (!bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (!bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    break;
- 	  info->flags |= DF_STATIC_TLS;
- 	  /* Fall through */
-@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h,
-      to R_390_TLS_LE64 requiring no TLS entry. For GOTIE12 and IEENT
-      we can save the dynamic TLS relocation.  */
-   if (h->got.refcount > 0
--      && !bfd_link_pic (info)
-+      && !bfd_link_dll (info)
-       && h->dynindx == -1
-       && elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-     {
-@@ -2662,7 +2662,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 
- 	  /* Relocations for tls literal pool entries.  */
- 	case R_390_TLS_IE64:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    {
- 	      Elf_Internal_Rela outrel;
- 	      asection *sreloc;
-@@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  else if (h != NULL)
- 	    {
- 	      tls_type = elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && h->dynindx == -1 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && h->dynindx == -1 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
- 		r_type = R_390_TLS_LE64;
- 	    }
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_GD64 && tls_type >= GOT_TLS_IE)
-@@ -2801,14 +2801,14 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	      if (local_got_offsets == NULL)
- 		abort();
- 	      off = local_got_offsets[r_symndx];
--	      if (bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	      if (bfd_link_dll (info))
- 		goto emit_tls_relocs;
- 	    }
- 	  else
- 	    {
- 	      off = h->got.offset;
- 	      tls_type = elf_s390_hash_entry(h)->tls_type;
--	      if (bfd_link_pic (info) || h->dynindx != -1 || tls_type < GOT_TLS_IE)
-+	      if (bfd_link_dll (info) || h->dynindx != -1 || tls_type < GOT_TLS_IE)
- 		goto emit_tls_relocs;
- 	    }
- 
-@@ -2825,7 +2825,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  break;
- 
- 	case R_390_TLS_LDM64:
--	  if (! bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	  if (! bfd_link_dll (info))
- 	    /* The literal pool entry this relocation refers to gets ignored
- 	       by the optimized code of the local exec model. Do nothing
- 	       and the value will turn out zero.  */
-@@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	  continue;
- 
- 	case R_390_TLS_LDO64:
--	  if (bfd_link_pic (info) || (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING))
-+	  if (bfd_link_dll (info) || (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING))
- 	    relocation -= dtpoff_base (info);
- 	  else
- 	    /* When converting LDO to LE, we must negate.  */
-@@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 
- 	  if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LOAD)
- 	    {
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
- 		{
- 		  /* IE->LE transition. Four valid cases:
- 		     lg %rx,(0,%ry)    -> sllg %rx,%ry,0
-@@ -2972,7 +2972,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 		  invalid_tls_insn (input_bfd, input_section, rel);
- 		  return false;
- 		}
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info) && (h == NULL || h->dynindx == -1))
- 		{
- 		  /* GD->LE transition.
- 		     brasl %r14,__tls_get_addr@plt -> brcl 0,. */
-@@ -2991,7 +2991,7 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
- 	    }
- 	  else if (r_type == R_390_TLS_LDCALL)
- 	    {
--	      if (!bfd_link_pic (info))
-+	      if (!bfd_link_dll (info))
- 		{
- 		  unsigned int insn0, insn1;
- 
--- 
-2.27.0
-

cross/binutils-armv7/binutils-s390x-2.patch

@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-From 9a01457e02e7bb594ff9a9ac62a38c909e2e3083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:30:55 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] s390: Add DT_JMPREL pointing to .rela.[i]plt with static-pie
-
-In static-pie case, there are IRELATIVE-relocs in
-.rela.iplt (htab->irelplt), which will later be grouped
-to .rela.plt.  On s390, the IRELATIVE relocations are
-always located in .rela.iplt - even for non-static case.
-Ensure that DT_JMPREL, DT_PLTRELA, DT_PLTRELASZ is added
-to the dynamic section even if htab->srelplt->size == 0.
-See _bfd_elf_add_dynamic_tags in bfd/elflink.c.
-
-bfd/
-	elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_size_dynamic_sections):
-	Enforce DT_JMPREL via htab->elf.dt_jmprel_required.
-
-(cherry picked from commit d942d8db12adf4c9e5c7d9ed6496a779ece7149e)
----
- bfd/elf64-s390.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/bfd/elf64-s390.c b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-index 00ee386baab..0b851f7ac0e 100644
---- a/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
-@@ -1876,7 +1876,20 @@ elf_s390_size_dynamic_sections (bfd *output_bfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
-       else if (startswith (bfd_section_name (s), ".rela"))
- 	{
- 	  if (s->size != 0 && s != htab->elf.srelplt)
--	    relocs = true;
-+	    {
-+	      relocs = true;
-+	      if (s == htab->elf.irelplt)
-+		{
-+		  /* In static-pie case, there are IRELATIVE-relocs in
-+		     .rela.iplt (htab->irelplt), which will later be grouped
-+		     to .rela.plt.  On s390, the IRELATIVE relocations are
-+		     always located in .rela.iplt - even for non-static case.
-+		     Ensure that DT_JMPREL, DT_PLTRELA, DT_PLTRELASZ is added
-+		     to the dynamic section even if htab->srelplt->size == 0.
-+		     See _bfd_elf_add_dynamic_tags in bfd/elflink.c.  */
-+		  htab->elf.dt_jmprel_required = true;
-+		}
-+	    }
- 
- 	  /* We use the reloc_count field as a counter if we need
- 	     to copy relocs into the output file.  */
--- 
-2.27.0
-