Now that all filesystems have been converted to use the symlink helper
functions, they no longer need the declaration of 'struct
fscrypt_symlink_data'. Move it from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_private.h.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky
logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar
on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating
the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make
things a bit easier:
- fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink
target will require on-disk.
- fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed.
The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking
whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for
the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause
the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in
directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when
creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length.
For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target
length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in
comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in
FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted.
Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even
though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries*
but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by
starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in
encrypted form.
Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when
doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to
exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this
bug didn't make a difference.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
fscrypt.h included way too many other headers, given that it is included
by filesystems both with and without encryption support. Trim down the
includes list by moving the needed includes into more appropriate
places, and removing the unneeded ones.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Only fs/crypto/fname.c cares about treating the "." and ".." filenames
specially with regards to encryption, so move fscrypt_is_dot_dotdot()
from fscrypt.h to there.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The encryption modes are validated by fs/crypto/, not by individual
filesystems. Therefore, move fscrypt_valid_enc_modes() from fscrypt.h
to fscrypt_private.h.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Filesystems now only define their fscrypt_operations when they are
compiled with encryption support, so move the fscrypt_operations
declaration from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_supp.h.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled() accesses ->s_cop, which now is only set
when the filesystem is built with encryption support. This didn't
actually matter because no filesystems called it. However, it will
start being used soon, so fix it by moving it from fscrypt.h to
fscrypt_supp.h and stubbing it out in fscrypt_notsupp.h.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Filesystems only ever access 'struct fscrypt_ctx' through fscrypt
functions. But when a filesystem is built without encryption support,
these functions are all stubbed out, so the declaration of fscrypt_ctx
is unneeded. Therefore, move it from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_supp.h.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
fscrypt_control_page() is already split into two versions depending on
whether the filesystem is being built with encryption support or not.
Move them into the appropriate headers.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
fscrypt_has_encryption_key() is already split into two versions
depending on whether the filesystem is being built with encryption
support or not. Move them into the appropriate headers.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Introduce a helper function for filesystems to call when processing
->setattr() on a possibly-encrypted inode. It handles enforcing that an
encrypted file can only be truncated if its encryption key is available.
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry
in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles
loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to
fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's
encryption key is available.
Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move
fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h.
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Introduce a helper function which prepares to rename a file into a
possibly encrypted directory. It handles loading the encryption keys
for the source and target directories if needed, and it handles
enforcing that if the target directory (and the source directory for a
cross-rename) is encrypted, then the file being moved into the directory
has the same encryption policy as its containing directory.
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Introduce a helper function which prepares to link an inode into a
possibly-encrypted directory. It handles setting up the target
directory's encryption key, then verifying that the link won't violate
the constraint that all files in an encrypted directory tree use the
same encryption policy.
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Add a helper function which checks if an inode is encrypted, and if so,
tries to set up its encryption key. This is a pattern which is
duplicated in multiple places in each of ext4, f2fs, and ubifs --- for
example, when a regular file is asked to be opened or truncated.
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now that all callers of fscrypt_operations.is_encrypted() have been
switched to IS_ENCRYPTED(), remove ->is_encrypted().
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Filesystems have to include different header files based on whether they
are compiled with encryption support or not. That's nasty and messy.
Instead, rationalise the headers so we have a single include fscrypt.h
and let it decide what internal implementation to include based on the
__FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION define. Filesystems set __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION to 1
before including linux/fscrypt.h if they are built with encryption
support. Otherwise, they must set __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION to 0.
Add guards to prevent fscrypt_supp.h and fscrypt_notsupp.h from being
directly included by filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
[EB: use 1 and 0 rather than defined/undefined]
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2018-01-04 16:32:32 -08:00
Renamed from include/linux/fscrypt_common.h (Browse further)
