vringh: Fix loop descriptors check in the indirect cases
[ Upstream commitdbd29e0752] We should use size of descriptor chain to test loop condition in the indirect case. And another statistical count is also introduced for indirect descriptors to avoid conflict with the statistical count of direct descriptors. Fixes:f87d0fbb57("vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings.") Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Message-Id: <20220505100910.137-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
362e3b3a59
commit
b6ea26873e
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
|
|||
int (*copy)(const struct vringh *vrh,
|
||||
void *dst, const void *src, size_t len))
|
||||
{
|
||||
int err, count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
|
||||
int err, count = 0, indirect_count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
|
||||
struct vring_desc desc, *descs;
|
||||
struct vringh_range range = { -1ULL, 0 }, slowrange;
|
||||
bool slow = false;
|
||||
|
|
@ -331,7 +331,12 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (count++ == vrh->vring.num) {
|
||||
if (up_next == -1)
|
||||
count++;
|
||||
else
|
||||
indirect_count++;
|
||||
|
||||
if (count > vrh->vring.num || indirect_count > desc_max) {
|
||||
vringh_bad("Descriptor loop in %p", descs);
|
||||
err = -ELOOP;
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
|
@ -393,6 +398,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
|
|||
i = return_from_indirect(vrh, &up_next,
|
||||
&descs, &desc_max);
|
||||
slow = false;
|
||||
indirect_count = 0;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue