forge/linux-uconsole
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

net/mlx5e: Update check for merged eswitch device

Browse source 
The current check only validates if both netdevs use the same ops
which means both are vf reps or both uplink reps.

Unlike the case where the two uplinks are bonded (VF LAG), under
multipath scheme the switchdev parent id is not unified between the
uplink reps (and all the associated vf reps). However, we still want
to duplicate in the driver encap flows, adjust the merged eswitch
check for that matter.

Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Roi Dayan 2019-02-05 09:41:43 +02:00 • committed by Saeed Mahameed
commit 68931c7dd7
1 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
View file

@ -2360,10 +2360,9 @@ static bool is_merged_eswitch_dev(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
peer_priv = netdev_priv(peer_netdev);
return (MLX5_CAP_ESW(priv->mdev, merged_eswitch) &&
(priv->netdev->netdev_ops == peer_netdev->netdev_ops) &&
same_hw_devs(priv, peer_priv) &&
MLX5_VPORT_MANAGER(peer_priv->mdev) &&
(peer_priv->mdev->priv.eswitch->mode == SRIOV_OFFLOADS));
mlx5e_eswitch_rep(priv->netdev) &&
mlx5e_eswitch_rep(peer_netdev) &&
same_hw_devs(priv, peer_priv));
}