bnxt_en: reject indirect blk offload when hw-tc-offload is off
[ Upstream commitb0757491a1] The driver does not check if hw-tc-offload is enabled for the device before offloading a flow in the context of indirect block callback. Fix this by checking NETIF_F_HW_TC in the features flag and rejecting the offload request. This will avoid unnecessary dmesg error logs when hw-tc-offload is disabled, such as these: bnxt_en 0000:19:00.1 eno2np1: dev(ifindex=294) not on same switch bnxt_en 0000:19:00.1 eno2np1: Error: bnxt_tc_add_flow: cookie=0xffff8dace1c88000 error=-22 bnxt_en 0000:19:00.0 eno1np0: dev(ifindex=294) not on same switch bnxt_en 0000:19:00.0 eno1np0: Error: bnxt_tc_add_flow: cookie=0xffff8dace1c88000 error=-22 Reported-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> Fixes:627c89d00f("bnxt_en: flow_offload: offload tunnel decap rules via indirect callbacks") Signed-off-by: Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4fc060abaa
commit
3d59416647
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -1854,7 +1854,7 @@ static int bnxt_tc_setup_indr_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type,
|
|||
struct flow_cls_offload *flower = type_data;
|
||||
struct bnxt *bp = priv->bp;
|
||||
|
||||
if (flower->common.chain_index)
|
||||
if (!tc_cls_can_offload_and_chain0(bp->dev, type_data))
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (type) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue