PM / Domains: Avoid a potential deadlock
Lockdep warns that prepare_lock and genpd->mlock can cause a deadlock
the deadlock scenario is like following:
First thread is probing cs2000
cs2000_probe()
clk_register()
__clk_core_init()
clk_prepare_lock() ----> acquires prepare_lock
cs2000_recalc_rate()
i2c_smbus_read_byte_data()
rcar_i2c_master_xfer()
dma_request_chan()
rcar_dmac_of_xlate()
rcar_dmac_alloc_chan_resources()
pm_runtime_get_sync()
__pm_runtime_resume()
rpm_resume()
rpm_callback()
genpd_runtime_resume() ----> acquires genpd->mlock
Second thread is attaching any device to the same PM domain
genpd_add_device()
genpd_lock() ----> acquires genpd->mlock
cpg_mssr_attach_dev()
of_clk_get_from_provider()
__of_clk_get_from_provider()
__clk_create_clk()
clk_prepare_lock() ----> acquires prepare_lock
Since currently no PM provider access genpd's critical section
in .attach_dev, and .detach_dev callbacks, so there is no need to protect
these two callbacks with genpd->mlock.
This patch avoids a potential deadlock by moving out .attach_dev and .detach_dev
from genpd->mlock, so that genpd->mlock won't be held when prepare_lock is acquired
in .attach_dev and .detach_dev
Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e98c678c2
commit
2071ac985d
1 changed files with 6 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -1469,12 +1469,12 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
|
|||
if (IS_ERR(gpd_data))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(gpd_data);
|
||||
|
||||
genpd_lock(genpd);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = genpd->attach_dev ? genpd->attach_dev(genpd, dev) : 0;
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
genpd_lock(genpd);
|
||||
|
||||
dev_pm_domain_set(dev, &genpd->domain);
|
||||
|
||||
genpd->device_count++;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1482,9 +1482,8 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
|
|||
|
||||
list_add_tail(&gpd_data->base.list_node, &genpd->dev_list);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
genpd_unlock(genpd);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
genpd_free_dev_data(dev, gpd_data);
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
|
@ -1533,15 +1532,15 @@ static int genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
|
|||
genpd->device_count--;
|
||||
genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (genpd->detach_dev)
|
||||
genpd->detach_dev(genpd, dev);
|
||||
|
||||
dev_pm_domain_set(dev, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
list_del_init(&pdd->list_node);
|
||||
|
||||
genpd_unlock(genpd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (genpd->detach_dev)
|
||||
genpd->detach_dev(genpd, dev);
|
||||
|
||||
genpd_free_dev_data(dev, gpd_data);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue