i40e: Avoid adding the TCP-IPv4 filter twice
There wasn't a need to play the logic twice, it seems like a left over from when we had to add two PTYPEs for one filter. There should be no change in the number of filters that actually got added to the hardware. Change-ID: I5071d02eafd020b60e30eb96219f110f334eec85 Signed-off-by: Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fbd5e2df9f
commit
12be846ddd
1 changed files with 0 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -271,19 +271,6 @@ static int i40e_add_del_fdir_tcpv4(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
|
|||
fd_data->pctype, ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fd_data->pctype = I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_NONF_IPV4_TCP;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = i40e_program_fdir_filter(fd_data, raw_packet, pf, add);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
|
||||
"Filter command send failed for PCTYPE %d (ret = %d)\n",
|
||||
fd_data->pctype, ret);
|
||||
err = true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "Filter OK for PCTYPE %d (ret = %d)\n",
|
||||
fd_data->pctype, ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return err ? -EOPNOTSUPP : 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue