 7937e878f9
			
		
	
	
	7937e878f9
	
	
	
		
			
			Documentation about the background and the design of mmc non-blocking. Host driver guidelines to minimize request preparation overhead. Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			87 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			3.8 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			87 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			3.8 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
| Rationale
 | |
| =========
 | |
| 
 | |
| How significant is the cache maintenance overhead?
 | |
| It depends. Fast eMMC and multiple cache levels with speculative cache
 | |
| pre-fetch makes the cache overhead relatively significant. If the DMA
 | |
| preparations for the next request are done in parallel with the current
 | |
| transfer, the DMA preparation overhead would not affect the MMC performance.
 | |
| The intention of non-blocking (asynchronous) MMC requests is to minimize the
 | |
| time between when an MMC request ends and another MMC request begins.
 | |
| Using mmc_wait_for_req(), the MMC controller is idle while dma_map_sg and
 | |
| dma_unmap_sg are processing. Using non-blocking MMC requests makes it
 | |
| possible to prepare the caches for next job in parallel with an active
 | |
| MMC request.
 | |
| 
 | |
| MMC block driver
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() in the MMC block driver is made non-blocking.
 | |
| The increase in throughput is proportional to the time it takes to
 | |
| prepare (major part of preparations are dma_map_sg() and dma_unmap_sg())
 | |
| a request and how fast the memory is. The faster the MMC/SD is the
 | |
| more significant the prepare request time becomes. Roughly the expected
 | |
| performance gain is 5% for large writes and 10% on large reads on a L2 cache
 | |
| platform. In power save mode, when clocks run on a lower frequency, the DMA
 | |
| preparation may cost even more. As long as these slower preparations are run
 | |
| in parallel with the transfer performance won't be affected.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Details on measurements from IOZone and mmc_test
 | |
| ================================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Specs/StoragePerfMMC-async-req
 | |
| 
 | |
| MMC core API extension
 | |
| ======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| There is one new public function mmc_start_req().
 | |
| It starts a new MMC command request for a host. The function isn't
 | |
| truly non-blocking. If there is an ongoing async request it waits
 | |
| for completion of that request and starts the new one and returns. It
 | |
| doesn't wait for the new request to complete. If there is no ongoing
 | |
| request it starts the new request and returns immediately.
 | |
| 
 | |
| MMC host extensions
 | |
| ===================
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are two optional members in the mmc_host_ops -- pre_req() and
 | |
| post_req() -- that the host driver may implement in order to move work
 | |
| to before and after the actual mmc_host_ops.request() function is called.
 | |
| In the DMA case pre_req() may do dma_map_sg() and prepare the DMA
 | |
| descriptor, and post_req() runs the dma_unmap_sg().
 | |
| 
 | |
| Optimize for the first request
 | |
| ==============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first request in a series of requests can't be prepared in parallel
 | |
| with the previous transfer, since there is no previous request.
 | |
| The argument is_first_req in pre_req() indicates that there is no previous
 | |
| request. The host driver may optimize for this scenario to minimize
 | |
| the performance loss. A way to optimize for this is to split the current
 | |
| request in two chunks, prepare the first chunk and start the request,
 | |
| and finally prepare the second chunk and start the transfer.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Pseudocode to handle is_first_req scenario with minimal prepare overhead:
 | |
| 
 | |
| if (is_first_req && req->size > threshold)
 | |
|    /* start MMC transfer for the complete transfer size */
 | |
|    mmc_start_command(MMC_CMD_TRANSFER_FULL_SIZE);
 | |
| 
 | |
|    /*
 | |
|     * Begin to prepare DMA while cmd is being processed by MMC.
 | |
|     * The first chunk of the request should take the same time
 | |
|     * to prepare as the "MMC process command time".
 | |
|     * If prepare time exceeds MMC cmd time
 | |
|     * the transfer is delayed, guesstimate max 4k as first chunk size.
 | |
|     */
 | |
|     prepare_1st_chunk_for_dma(req);
 | |
|     /* flush pending desc to the DMAC (dmaengine.h) */
 | |
|     dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
 | |
| 
 | |
|     prepare_2nd_chunk_for_dma(req);
 | |
|     /*
 | |
|      * The second issue_pending should be called before MMC runs out
 | |
|      * of the first chunk. If the MMC runs out of the first data chunk
 | |
|      * before this call, the transfer is delayed.
 | |
|      */
 | |
|     dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
 |