 e65fe5a914
			
		
	
	
	e65fe5a914
	
	
	
		
			
			Non-void functions should describe their return values in their kernel-doc comments. Currently, some don't, others do in various forms. For example: * Return the result. * Return: The result. * Returns the result. * Returns: the result. * Return Value: The result. * @return: the result. * This function returns the result. * It will return the result. Defining a convention would improve consistency of kernel-doc comments. It would also help scripts/kernel-doc identify the text describing the return value of a function. Thus allowing additional checks on the comments, and suitable highlighting in the generated docs (man pages, html, etc). So, as a convention, use a section named "Return" to describe the return value of a function. Signed-off-by: Yacine Belkadi <yacine.belkadi.1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			361 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			12 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			361 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			12 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
| kernel-doc nano-HOWTO
 | |
| =====================
 | |
| 
 | |
| How to format kernel-doc comments
 | |
| ---------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| In order to provide embedded, 'C' friendly, easy to maintain,
 | |
| but consistent and extractable documentation of the functions and
 | |
| data structures in the Linux kernel, the Linux kernel has adopted
 | |
| a consistent style for documenting functions and their parameters,
 | |
| and structures and their members.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The format for this documentation is called the kernel-doc format.
 | |
| It is documented in this Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt file.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This style embeds the documentation within the source files, using
 | |
| a few simple conventions.  The scripts/kernel-doc perl script, some
 | |
| SGML templates in Documentation/DocBook, and other tools understand
 | |
| these conventions, and are used to extract this embedded documentation
 | |
| into various documents.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In order to provide good documentation of kernel functions and data
 | |
| structures, please use the following conventions to format your
 | |
| kernel-doc comments in Linux kernel source.
 | |
| 
 | |
| We definitely need kernel-doc formatted documentation for functions
 | |
| that are exported to loadable modules using EXPORT_SYMBOL.
 | |
| 
 | |
| We also look to provide kernel-doc formatted documentation for
 | |
| functions externally visible to other kernel files (not marked
 | |
| "static").
 | |
| 
 | |
| We also recommend providing kernel-doc formatted documentation
 | |
| for private (file "static") routines, for consistency of kernel
 | |
| source code layout.  But this is lower priority and at the
 | |
| discretion of the MAINTAINER of that kernel source file.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Data structures visible in kernel include files should also be
 | |
| documented using kernel-doc formatted comments.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The opening comment mark "/**" is reserved for kernel-doc comments.
 | |
| Only comments so marked will be considered by the kernel-doc scripts,
 | |
| and any comment so marked must be in kernel-doc format.  Do not use
 | |
| "/**" to be begin a comment block unless the comment block contains
 | |
| kernel-doc formatted comments.  The closing comment marker for
 | |
| kernel-doc comments can be either "*/" or "**/", but "*/" is
 | |
| preferred in the Linux kernel tree.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Kernel-doc comments should be placed just before the function
 | |
| or data structure being described.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example kernel-doc function comment:
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * foobar() - short function description of foobar
 | |
|  * @arg1:	Describe the first argument to foobar.
 | |
|  * @arg2:	Describe the second argument to foobar.
 | |
|  *		One can provide multiple line descriptions
 | |
|  *		for arguments.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * A longer description, with more discussion of the function foobar()
 | |
|  * that might be useful to those using or modifying it.  Begins with
 | |
|  * empty comment line, and may include additional embedded empty
 | |
|  * comment lines.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * The longer description can have multiple paragraphs.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Return: Describe the return value of foobar.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| 
 | |
| The short description following the subject can span multiple lines
 | |
| and ends with an @argument description, an empty line or the end of
 | |
| the comment block.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The @argument descriptions must begin on the very next line following
 | |
| this opening short function description line, with no intervening
 | |
| empty comment lines.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a function parameter is "..." (varargs), it should be listed in
 | |
| kernel-doc notation as:
 | |
|  * @...: description
 | |
| 
 | |
| The return value, if any, should be described in a dedicated section
 | |
| named "Return".
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example kernel-doc data structure comment.
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * struct blah - the basic blah structure
 | |
|  * @mem1:	describe the first member of struct blah
 | |
|  * @mem2:	describe the second member of struct blah,
 | |
|  *		perhaps with more lines and words.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Longer description of this structure.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| 
 | |
| The kernel-doc function comments describe each parameter to the
 | |
| function, in order, with the @name lines.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The kernel-doc data structure comments describe each structure member
 | |
| in the data structure, with the @name lines.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The longer description formatting is "reflowed", losing your line
 | |
| breaks.  So presenting carefully formatted lists within these
 | |
| descriptions won't work so well; derived documentation will lose
 | |
| the formatting.
 | |
| 
 | |
| See the section below "How to add extractable documentation to your
 | |
| source files" for more details and notes on how to format kernel-doc
 | |
| comments.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Components of the kernel-doc system
 | |
| -----------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many places in the source tree have extractable documentation in the
 | |
| form of block comments above functions.  The components of this system
 | |
| are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - scripts/kernel-doc
 | |
| 
 | |
|   This is a perl script that hunts for the block comments and can mark
 | |
|   them up directly into DocBook, man, text, and HTML. (No, not
 | |
|   texinfo.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Documentation/DocBook/*.tmpl
 | |
| 
 | |
|   These are SGML template files, which are normal SGML files with
 | |
|   special place-holders for where the extracted documentation should
 | |
|   go.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - scripts/basic/docproc.c
 | |
| 
 | |
|   This is a program for converting SGML template files into SGML
 | |
|   files. When a file is referenced it is searched for symbols
 | |
|   exported (EXPORT_SYMBOL), to be able to distinguish between internal
 | |
|   and external functions.
 | |
|   It invokes kernel-doc, giving it the list of functions that
 | |
|   are to be documented.
 | |
|   Additionally it is used to scan the SGML template files to locate
 | |
|   all the files referenced herein. This is used to generate dependency
 | |
|   information as used by make.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Makefile
 | |
| 
 | |
|   The targets 'sgmldocs', 'psdocs', 'pdfdocs', and 'htmldocs' are used
 | |
|   to build DocBook files, PostScript files, PDF files, and html files
 | |
|   in Documentation/DocBook.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Documentation/DocBook/Makefile
 | |
| 
 | |
|   This is where C files are associated with SGML templates.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| How to extract the documentation
 | |
| --------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you just want to read the ready-made books on the various
 | |
| subsystems (see Documentation/DocBook/*.tmpl), just type 'make
 | |
| psdocs', or 'make pdfdocs', or 'make htmldocs', depending on your
 | |
| preference.  If you would rather read a different format, you can type
 | |
| 'make sgmldocs' and then use DocBook tools to convert
 | |
| Documentation/DocBook/*.sgml to a format of your choice (for example,
 | |
| 'db2html ...' if 'make htmldocs' was not defined).
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want to see man pages instead, you can do this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| $ cd linux
 | |
| $ scripts/kernel-doc -man $(find -name '*.c') | split-man.pl /tmp/man
 | |
| $ scripts/kernel-doc -man $(find -name '*.h') | split-man.pl /tmp/man
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here is split-man.pl:
 | |
| 
 | |
| -->
 | |
| #!/usr/bin/perl
 | |
| 
 | |
| if ($#ARGV < 0) {
 | |
|    die "where do I put the results?\n";
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| mkdir $ARGV[0],0777;
 | |
| $state = 0;
 | |
| while (<STDIN>) {
 | |
|     if (/^\.TH \"[^\"]*\" 9 \"([^\"]*)\"/) {
 | |
| 	if ($state == 1) { close OUT }
 | |
| 	$state = 1;
 | |
| 	$fn = "$ARGV[0]/$1.9";
 | |
| 	print STDERR "Creating $fn\n";
 | |
| 	open OUT, ">$fn" or die "can't open $fn: $!\n";
 | |
| 	print OUT $_;
 | |
|     } elsif ($state != 0) {
 | |
| 	print OUT $_;
 | |
|     }
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| close OUT;
 | |
| <--
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you just want to view the documentation for one function in one
 | |
| file, you can do this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| $ scripts/kernel-doc -man -function fn file | nroff -man | less
 | |
| 
 | |
| or this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| $ scripts/kernel-doc -text -function fn file
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| How to add extractable documentation to your source files
 | |
| ---------------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The format of the block comment is like this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * function_name(:)? (- short description)?
 | |
| (* @parameterx(space)*: (description of parameter x)?)*
 | |
| (* a blank line)?
 | |
|  * (Description:)? (Description of function)?
 | |
|  * (section header: (section description)? )*
 | |
| (*)?*/
 | |
| 
 | |
| All "description" text can span multiple lines, although the
 | |
| function_name & its short description are traditionally on a single line.
 | |
| Description text may also contain blank lines (i.e., lines that contain
 | |
| only a "*").
 | |
| 
 | |
| "section header:" names must be unique per function (or struct,
 | |
| union, typedef, enum).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Use the section header "Return" for sections describing the return value
 | |
| of a function.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Avoid putting a spurious blank line after the function name, or else the
 | |
| description will be repeated!
 | |
| 
 | |
| All descriptive text is further processed, scanning for the following special
 | |
| patterns, which are highlighted appropriately.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 'funcname()' - function
 | |
| '$ENVVAR' - environment variable
 | |
| '&struct_name' - name of a structure (up to two words including 'struct')
 | |
| '@parameter' - name of a parameter
 | |
| '%CONST' - name of a constant.
 | |
| 
 | |
| NOTE 1:  The multi-line descriptive text you provide does *not* recognize
 | |
| line breaks, so if you try to format some text nicely, as in:
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Return:
 | |
|     0 - cool
 | |
|     1 - invalid arg
 | |
|     2 - out of memory
 | |
| 
 | |
| this will all run together and produce:
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Return: 0 - cool 1 - invalid arg 2 - out of memory
 | |
| 
 | |
| NOTE 2:  If the descriptive text you provide has lines that begin with
 | |
| some phrase followed by a colon, each of those phrases will be taken as
 | |
| a new section heading, which means you should similarly try to avoid text
 | |
| like:
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Return:
 | |
|     0: cool
 | |
|     1: invalid arg
 | |
|     2: out of memory
 | |
| 
 | |
| every line of which would start a new section.  Again, probably not
 | |
| what you were after.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Take a look around the source tree for examples.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| kernel-doc for structs, unions, enums, and typedefs
 | |
| ---------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Beside functions you can also write documentation for structs, unions,
 | |
| enums and typedefs. Instead of the function name you must write the name
 | |
| of the declaration;  the struct/union/enum/typedef must always precede
 | |
| the name. Nesting of declarations is not supported.
 | |
| Use the argument mechanism to document members or constants.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Inside a struct description, you can use the "private:" and "public:"
 | |
| comment tags.  Structure fields that are inside a "private:" area
 | |
| are not listed in the generated output documentation.  The "private:"
 | |
| and "public:" tags must begin immediately following a "/*" comment
 | |
| marker.  They may optionally include comments between the ":" and the
 | |
| ending "*/" marker.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * struct my_struct - short description
 | |
|  * @a: first member
 | |
|  * @b: second member
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Longer description
 | |
|  */
 | |
| struct my_struct {
 | |
|     int a;
 | |
|     int b;
 | |
| /* private: internal use only */
 | |
|     int c;
 | |
| };
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Including documentation blocks in source files
 | |
| ----------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| To facilitate having source code and comments close together, you can
 | |
| include kernel-doc documentation blocks that are free-form comments
 | |
| instead of being kernel-doc for functions, structures, unions,
 | |
| enums, or typedefs.  This could be used for something like a
 | |
| theory of operation for a driver or library code, for example.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is done by using a DOC: section keyword with a section title.  E.g.:
 | |
| 
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * DOC: Theory of Operation
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * The whizbang foobar is a dilly of a gizmo.  It can do whatever you
 | |
|  * want it to do, at any time.  It reads your mind.  Here's how it works.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * foo bar splat
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * The only drawback to this gizmo is that is can sometimes damage
 | |
|  * hardware, software, or its subject(s).
 | |
|  */
 | |
| 
 | |
| DOC: sections are used in SGML templates files as indicated below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| How to make new SGML template files
 | |
| -----------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| SGML template files (*.tmpl) are like normal SGML files, except that
 | |
| they can contain escape sequences where extracted documentation should
 | |
| be inserted.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !E<filename> is replaced by the documentation, in <filename>, for
 | |
| functions that are exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL: the function list is
 | |
| collected from files listed in Documentation/DocBook/Makefile.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !I<filename> is replaced by the documentation for functions that are
 | |
| _not_ exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !D<filename> is used to name additional files to search for functions
 | |
| exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !F<filename> <function [functions...]> is replaced by the
 | |
| documentation, in <filename>, for the functions listed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !P<filename> <section title> is replaced by the contents of the DOC:
 | |
| section titled <section title> from <filename>.
 | |
| Spaces are allowed in <section title>; do not quote the <section title>.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !C<filename> is replaced by nothing, but makes the tools check that
 | |
| all DOC: sections and documented functions, symbols, etc. are used.
 | |
| This makes sense to use when you use !F/!P only and want to verify
 | |
| that all documentation is included.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Tim.
 | |
| */ <twaugh@redhat.com>
 |