 fb0527bd5e
			
		
	
	
	fb0527bd5e
	
	
	
		
			
			Since we want a task waiting for a mutex_lock() to go to sleep and reschedule on need_resched() we must be able to abort the mcs_spin_lock() around the adaptive spin. Therefore implement a cancelable mcs lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: davidlohr@hp.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: andi@firstfloor.org Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: scott.norton@hp.com Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-62hcl5wxydmjzd182zhvk89m@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			178 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			4.1 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			178 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			4.1 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
| 
 | |
| #include <linux/percpu.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/mutex.h>
 | |
| #include <linux/sched.h>
 | |
| #include "mcs_spinlock.h"
 | |
| 
 | |
| #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * An MCS like lock especially tailored for optimistic spinning for sleeping
 | |
|  * lock implementations (mutex, rwsem, etc).
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Using a single mcs node per CPU is safe because sleeping locks should not be
 | |
|  * called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while
 | |
|  * spinning.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_queue, osq_node);
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes.
 | |
|  * Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| static inline struct optimistic_spin_queue *
 | |
| osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock,
 | |
| 	      struct optimistic_spin_queue *node,
 | |
| 	      struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	struct optimistic_spin_queue *next = NULL;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	for (;;) {
 | |
| 		if (*lock == node && cmpxchg(lock, node, prev) == node) {
 | |
| 			/*
 | |
| 			 * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
 | |
| 			 * will now observe @lock and will complete its
 | |
| 			 * unlock()/unqueue().
 | |
| 			 */
 | |
| 			break;
 | |
| 		}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		/*
 | |
| 		 * We must xchg() the @node->next value, because if we were to
 | |
| 		 * leave it in, a concurrent unlock()/unqueue() from
 | |
| 		 * @node->next might complete Step-A and think its @prev is
 | |
| 		 * still valid.
 | |
| 		 *
 | |
| 		 * If the concurrent unlock()/unqueue() wins the race, we'll
 | |
| 		 * wait for either @lock to point to us, through its Step-B, or
 | |
| 		 * wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C.
 | |
| 		 */
 | |
| 		if (node->next) {
 | |
| 			next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
 | |
| 			if (next)
 | |
| 				break;
 | |
| 		}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 | |
| 	}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	return next;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
 | |
| 	struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev, *next;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	node->locked = 0;
 | |
| 	node->next = NULL;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	node->prev = prev = xchg(lock, node);
 | |
| 	if (likely(prev == NULL))
 | |
| 		return true;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that
 | |
| 	 * moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack.
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're
 | |
| 	 * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply
 | |
| 	 * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	while (!smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) {
 | |
| 		/*
 | |
| 		 * If we need to reschedule bail... so we can block.
 | |
| 		 */
 | |
| 		if (need_resched())
 | |
| 			goto unqueue;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 | |
| 	}
 | |
| 	return true;
 | |
| 
 | |
| unqueue:
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Step - A  -- stabilize @prev
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's
 | |
| 	 * unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us
 | |
| 	 * (or later).
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	for (;;) {
 | |
| 		if (prev->next == node &&
 | |
| 		    cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node)
 | |
| 			break;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		/*
 | |
| 		 * We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(),
 | |
| 		 * in which case we should observe @node->locked becomming
 | |
| 		 * true.
 | |
| 		 */
 | |
| 		if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
 | |
| 			return true;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		/*
 | |
| 		 * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
 | |
| 		 * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer.
 | |
| 		 */
 | |
| 		prev = ACCESS_ONCE(node->prev);
 | |
| 	}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Step - B -- stabilize @next
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node
 | |
| 	 * back to @prev.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev);
 | |
| 	if (!next)
 | |
| 		return false;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Step - C -- unlink
 | |
| 	 *
 | |
| 	 * @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next
 | |
| 	 * pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and
 | |
| 	 * it will wait in Step-A.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	ACCESS_ONCE(next->prev) = prev;
 | |
| 	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = next;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	return false;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
 | |
| {
 | |
| 	struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
 | |
| 	struct optimistic_spin_queue *next;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Fast path for the uncontended case.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
 | |
| 		return;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	/*
 | |
| 	 * Second most likely case.
 | |
| 	 */
 | |
| 	next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
 | |
| 	if (next) {
 | |
| 		ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
 | |
| 		return;
 | |
| 	}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, NULL);
 | |
| 	if (next)
 | |
| 		ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 |