Since we want a task waiting for a mutex_lock() to go to sleep and reschedule on need_resched() we must be able to abort the mcs_spin_lock() around the adaptive spin. Therefore implement a cancelable mcs lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: davidlohr@hp.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: andi@firstfloor.org Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: scott.norton@hp.com Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-62hcl5wxydmjzd182zhvk89m@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			178 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			4.1 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			178 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			4.1 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
 | 
						|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
 | 
						|
#include <linux/mutex.h>
 | 
						|
#include <linux/sched.h>
 | 
						|
#include "mcs_spinlock.h"
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
/*
 | 
						|
 * An MCS like lock especially tailored for optimistic spinning for sleeping
 | 
						|
 * lock implementations (mutex, rwsem, etc).
 | 
						|
 *
 | 
						|
 * Using a single mcs node per CPU is safe because sleeping locks should not be
 | 
						|
 * called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while
 | 
						|
 * spinning.
 | 
						|
 */
 | 
						|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_queue, osq_node);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
/*
 | 
						|
 * Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes.
 | 
						|
 * Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead.
 | 
						|
 */
 | 
						|
static inline struct optimistic_spin_queue *
 | 
						|
osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock,
 | 
						|
	      struct optimistic_spin_queue *node,
 | 
						|
	      struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_queue *next = NULL;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	for (;;) {
 | 
						|
		if (*lock == node && cmpxchg(lock, node, prev) == node) {
 | 
						|
			/*
 | 
						|
			 * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
 | 
						|
			 * will now observe @lock and will complete its
 | 
						|
			 * unlock()/unqueue().
 | 
						|
			 */
 | 
						|
			break;
 | 
						|
		}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * We must xchg() the @node->next value, because if we were to
 | 
						|
		 * leave it in, a concurrent unlock()/unqueue() from
 | 
						|
		 * @node->next might complete Step-A and think its @prev is
 | 
						|
		 * still valid.
 | 
						|
		 *
 | 
						|
		 * If the concurrent unlock()/unqueue() wins the race, we'll
 | 
						|
		 * wait for either @lock to point to us, through its Step-B, or
 | 
						|
		 * wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		if (node->next) {
 | 
						|
			next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
 | 
						|
			if (next)
 | 
						|
				break;
 | 
						|
		}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 | 
						|
	}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	return next;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev, *next;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	node->locked = 0;
 | 
						|
	node->next = NULL;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	node->prev = prev = xchg(lock, node);
 | 
						|
	if (likely(prev == NULL))
 | 
						|
		return true;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that
 | 
						|
	 * moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack.
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're
 | 
						|
	 * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply
 | 
						|
	 * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	while (!smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) {
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * If we need to reschedule bail... so we can block.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		if (need_resched())
 | 
						|
			goto unqueue;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 | 
						|
	}
 | 
						|
	return true;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
unqueue:
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Step - A  -- stabilize @prev
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's
 | 
						|
	 * unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us
 | 
						|
	 * (or later).
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	for (;;) {
 | 
						|
		if (prev->next == node &&
 | 
						|
		    cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node)
 | 
						|
			break;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(),
 | 
						|
		 * in which case we should observe @node->locked becomming
 | 
						|
		 * true.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
 | 
						|
			return true;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		/*
 | 
						|
		 * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
 | 
						|
		 * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer.
 | 
						|
		 */
 | 
						|
		prev = ACCESS_ONCE(node->prev);
 | 
						|
	}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Step - B -- stabilize @next
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node
 | 
						|
	 * back to @prev.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev);
 | 
						|
	if (!next)
 | 
						|
		return false;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Step - C -- unlink
 | 
						|
	 *
 | 
						|
	 * @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next
 | 
						|
	 * pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and
 | 
						|
	 * it will wait in Step-A.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	ACCESS_ONCE(next->prev) = prev;
 | 
						|
	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = next;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	return false;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
 | 
						|
	struct optimistic_spin_queue *next;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Fast path for the uncontended case.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
 | 
						|
		return;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	/*
 | 
						|
	 * Second most likely case.
 | 
						|
	 */
 | 
						|
	next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
 | 
						|
	if (next) {
 | 
						|
		ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
 | 
						|
		return;
 | 
						|
	}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, NULL);
 | 
						|
	if (next)
 | 
						|
		ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
#endif
 | 
						|
 |