 7034228792
			
		
	
	
	7034228792
	
	
	
		
			
			Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			236 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			7.5 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			236 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			7.5 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			C
		
	
	
	
	
	
| /*
 | |
|  * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
 | |
|  * License.  See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
 | |
|  * for more details.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Copyright (C) 2002, 2004, 2007 by Ralf Baechle
 | |
|  * Copyright (C) 2007  Maciej W. Rozycki
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef _ASM_WAR_H
 | |
| #define _ASM_WAR_H
 | |
| 
 | |
| #include <war.h>
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Work around certain R4000 CPU errata (as implemented by GCC):
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * - A double-word or a variable shift may give an incorrect result
 | |
|  *   if executed immediately after starting an integer division:
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0",
 | |
|  *   erratum #28
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4000MC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", erratum
 | |
|  *   #19
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * - A double-word or a variable shift may give an incorrect result
 | |
|  *   if executed while an integer multiplication is in progress:
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0",
 | |
|  *   errata #16 & #28
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * - An integer division may give an incorrect result if started in
 | |
|  *   a delay slot of a taken branch or a jump:
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0",
 | |
|  *   erratum #52
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS
 | |
| #define R4000_WAR 1
 | |
| #else
 | |
| #define R4000_WAR 0
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Work around certain R4400 CPU errata (as implemented by GCC):
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * - A double-word or a variable shift may give an incorrect result
 | |
|  *   if executed immediately after starting an integer division:
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4400MC Errata, Processor Revision 1.0", erratum #10
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4400MC Errata, Processor Revision 2.0 & 3.0", erratum #4
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_R4400_WORKAROUNDS
 | |
| #define R4400_WAR 1
 | |
| #else
 | |
| #define R4400_WAR 0
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Work around the "daddi" and "daddiu" CPU errata:
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * - The `daddi' instruction fails to trap on overflow.
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0",
 | |
|  *   erratum #23
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * - The `daddiu' instruction can produce an incorrect result.
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0",
 | |
|  *   erratum #41
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4000MC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", erratum
 | |
|  *   #15
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4400PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 1.0", erratum #7
 | |
|  *   "MIPS R4400MC Errata, Processor Revision 1.0", erratum #5
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_DADDI_WORKAROUNDS
 | |
| #define DADDI_WAR 1
 | |
| #else
 | |
| #define DADDI_WAR 0
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Another R4600 erratum.  Due to the lack of errata information the exact
 | |
|  * technical details aren't known.  I've experimentally found that disabling
 | |
|  * interrupts during indexed I-cache flushes seems to be sufficient to deal
 | |
|  * with the issue.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef R4600_V1_INDEX_ICACHEOP_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of R4600_V1_INDEX_ICACHEOP_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Pleasures of the R4600 V1.x.	 Cite from the IDT R4600 V1.7 errata:
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  *  18. The CACHE instructions Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D, Hit_Writeback_D,
 | |
|  *	Hit_Invalidate_D and Create_Dirty_Excl_D should only be
 | |
|  *	executed if there is no other dcache activity. If the dcache is
 | |
|  *	accessed for another instruction immeidately preceding when these
 | |
|  *	cache instructions are executing, it is possible that the dcache
 | |
|  *	tag match outputs used by these cache instructions will be
 | |
|  *	incorrect. These cache instructions should be preceded by at least
 | |
|  *	four instructions that are not any kind of load or store
 | |
|  *	instruction.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  *	This is not allowed:	lw
 | |
|  *				nop
 | |
|  *				nop
 | |
|  *				nop
 | |
|  *				cache	    Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  *	This is allowed:	lw
 | |
|  *				nop
 | |
|  *				nop
 | |
|  *				nop
 | |
|  *				nop
 | |
|  *				cache	    Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef R4600_V1_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of R4600_V1_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Writeback and invalidate the primary cache dcache before DMA.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * R4600 v2.0 bug: "The CACHE instructions Hit_Writeback_Inv_D,
 | |
|  * Hit_Writeback_D, Hit_Invalidate_D and Create_Dirty_Exclusive_D will only
 | |
|  * operate correctly if the internal data cache refill buffer is empty.	 These
 | |
|  * CACHE instructions should be separated from any potential data cache miss
 | |
|  * by a load instruction to an uncached address to empty the response buffer."
 | |
|  * (Revision 2.0 device errata from IDT available on http://www.idt.com/
 | |
|  * in .pdf format.)
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef R4600_V2_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of R4600_V2_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * When an interrupt happens on a CP0 register read instruction, CPU may
 | |
|  * lock up or read corrupted values of CP0 registers after it enters
 | |
|  * the exception handler.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * This workaround makes sure that we read a "safe" CP0 register as the
 | |
|  * first thing in the exception handler, which breaks one of the
 | |
|  * pre-conditions for this problem.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef R5432_CP0_INTERRUPT_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of R5432_CP0_INTERRUPT_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Workaround for the Sibyte M3 errata the text of which can be found at
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  *   http://sibyte.broadcom.com/hw/bcm1250/docs/pass2errata.txt
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * This will enable the use of a special TLB refill handler which does a
 | |
|  * consistency check on the information in c0_badvaddr and c0_entryhi and
 | |
|  * will just return and take the exception again if the information was
 | |
|  * found to be inconsistent.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef BCM1250_M3_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of BCM1250_M3_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * This is a DUART workaround related to glitches around register accesses
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef SIBYTE_1956_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of SIBYTE_1956_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Fill buffers not flushed on CACHE instructions
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Hit_Invalidate_I cacheops invalidate an icache line but the refill
 | |
|  * for that line can get stale data from the fill buffer instead of
 | |
|  * accessing memory if the previous icache miss was also to that line.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Workaround: generate an icache refill from a different line
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Affects:
 | |
|  *  MIPS 4K		RTL revision <3.0, PRID revision <4
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef MIPS4K_ICACHE_REFILL_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of MIPS4K_ICACHE_REFILL_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * Missing implicit forced flush of evictions caused by CACHE
 | |
|  * instruction
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Evictions caused by a CACHE instructions are not forced on to the
 | |
|  * bus. The BIU gives higher priority to fetches than to the data from
 | |
|  * the eviction buffer and no collision detection is performed between
 | |
|  * fetches and pending data from the eviction buffer.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Workaround: Execute a SYNC instruction after the cache instruction
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Affects:
 | |
|  *   MIPS 5Kc,5Kf	RTL revision <2.3, PRID revision <8
 | |
|  *   MIPS 20Kc		RTL revision <4.0, PRID revision <?
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef MIPS_CACHE_SYNC_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of MIPS_CACHE_SYNC_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * From TX49/H2 manual: "If the instruction (i.e. CACHE) is issued for
 | |
|  * the line which this instruction itself exists, the following
 | |
|  * operation is not guaranteed."
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * Workaround: do two phase flushing for Index_Invalidate_I
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef TX49XX_ICACHE_INDEX_INV_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of TX49XX_ICACHE_INDEX_INV_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * The RM7000 processors and the E9000 cores have a bug (though PMC-Sierra
 | |
|  * opposes it being called that) where invalid instructions in the same
 | |
|  * I-cache line worth of instructions being fetched may case spurious
 | |
|  * exceptions.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * On the R10000 up to version 2.6 (not sure about 2.7) there is a bug that
 | |
|  * may cause ll / sc and lld / scd sequences to execute non-atomically.
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef R10000_LLSC_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of R10000_LLSC_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
|  * 34K core erratum: "Problems Executing the TLBR Instruction"
 | |
|  */
 | |
| #ifndef MIPS34K_MISSED_ITLB_WAR
 | |
| #error Check setting of MIPS34K_MISSED_ITLB_WAR for your platform
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| 
 | |
| #endif /* _ASM_WAR_H */
 |