The struct i2c_board_info member holding the name is "type", not "name". Signed-off-by: Roman Fietze <roman.fietze@telemotive.de> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org
		
			
				
	
	
		
			211 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			8.6 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			211 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			8.6 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
How to instantiate I2C devices
 | 
						|
==============================
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Unlike PCI or USB devices, I2C devices are not enumerated at the hardware
 | 
						|
level. Instead, the software must know which devices are connected on each
 | 
						|
I2C bus segment, and what address these devices are using. For this
 | 
						|
reason, the kernel code must instantiate I2C devices explicitly. There are
 | 
						|
several ways to achieve this, depending on the context and requirements.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Method 1: Declare the I2C devices by bus number
 | 
						|
-----------------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This method is appropriate when the I2C bus is a system bus as is the case
 | 
						|
for many embedded systems. On such systems, each I2C bus has a number
 | 
						|
which is known in advance. It is thus possible to pre-declare the I2C
 | 
						|
devices which live on this bus. This is done with an array of struct
 | 
						|
i2c_board_info which is registered by calling i2c_register_board_info().
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Example (from omap2 h4):
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
static struct i2c_board_info __initdata h4_i2c_board_info[] = {
 | 
						|
	{
 | 
						|
		I2C_BOARD_INFO("isp1301_omap", 0x2d),
 | 
						|
		.irq		= OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(125),
 | 
						|
	},
 | 
						|
	{	/* EEPROM on mainboard */
 | 
						|
		I2C_BOARD_INFO("24c01", 0x52),
 | 
						|
		.platform_data	= &m24c01,
 | 
						|
	},
 | 
						|
	{	/* EEPROM on cpu card */
 | 
						|
		I2C_BOARD_INFO("24c01", 0x57),
 | 
						|
		.platform_data	= &m24c01,
 | 
						|
	},
 | 
						|
};
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
static void __init omap_h4_init(void)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	(...)
 | 
						|
	i2c_register_board_info(1, h4_i2c_board_info,
 | 
						|
			ARRAY_SIZE(h4_i2c_board_info));
 | 
						|
	(...)
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The above code declares 3 devices on I2C bus 1, including their respective
 | 
						|
addresses and custom data needed by their drivers. When the I2C bus in
 | 
						|
question is registered, the I2C devices will be instantiated automatically
 | 
						|
by i2c-core.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The devices will be automatically unbound and destroyed when the I2C bus
 | 
						|
they sit on goes away (if ever.)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Method 2: Instantiate the devices explicitly
 | 
						|
--------------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This method is appropriate when a larger device uses an I2C bus for
 | 
						|
internal communication. A typical case is TV adapters. These can have a
 | 
						|
tuner, a video decoder, an audio decoder, etc. usually connected to the
 | 
						|
main chip by the means of an I2C bus. You won't know the number of the I2C
 | 
						|
bus in advance, so the method 1 described above can't be used. Instead,
 | 
						|
you can instantiate your I2C devices explicitly. This is done by filling
 | 
						|
a struct i2c_board_info and calling i2c_new_device().
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Example (from the sfe4001 network driver):
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
static struct i2c_board_info sfe4001_hwmon_info = {
 | 
						|
	I2C_BOARD_INFO("max6647", 0x4e),
 | 
						|
};
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
int sfe4001_init(struct efx_nic *efx)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	(...)
 | 
						|
	efx->board_info.hwmon_client =
 | 
						|
		i2c_new_device(&efx->i2c_adap, &sfe4001_hwmon_info);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	(...)
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The above code instantiates 1 I2C device on the I2C bus which is on the
 | 
						|
network adapter in question.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A variant of this is when you don't know for sure if an I2C device is
 | 
						|
present or not (for example for an optional feature which is not present
 | 
						|
on cheap variants of a board but you have no way to tell them apart), or
 | 
						|
it may have different addresses from one board to the next (manufacturer
 | 
						|
changing its design without notice). In this case, you can call
 | 
						|
i2c_new_probed_device() instead of i2c_new_device().
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Example (from the pnx4008 OHCI driver):
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = { 0x2c, 0x2d, I2C_CLIENT_END };
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
static int __devinit usb_hcd_pnx4008_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 | 
						|
{
 | 
						|
	(...)
 | 
						|
	struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap;
 | 
						|
	struct i2c_board_info i2c_info;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	(...)
 | 
						|
	i2c_adap = i2c_get_adapter(2);
 | 
						|
	memset(&i2c_info, 0, sizeof(struct i2c_board_info));
 | 
						|
	strlcpy(i2c_info.type, "isp1301_pnx", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
 | 
						|
	isp1301_i2c_client = i2c_new_probed_device(i2c_adap, &i2c_info,
 | 
						|
						   normal_i2c, NULL);
 | 
						|
	i2c_put_adapter(i2c_adap);
 | 
						|
	(...)
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The above code instantiates up to 1 I2C device on the I2C bus which is on
 | 
						|
the OHCI adapter in question. It first tries at address 0x2c, if nothing
 | 
						|
is found there it tries address 0x2d, and if still nothing is found, it
 | 
						|
simply gives up.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The driver which instantiated the I2C device is responsible for destroying
 | 
						|
it on cleanup. This is done by calling i2c_unregister_device() on the
 | 
						|
pointer that was earlier returned by i2c_new_device() or
 | 
						|
i2c_new_probed_device().
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Method 3: Probe an I2C bus for certain devices
 | 
						|
----------------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Sometimes you do not have enough information about an I2C device, not even
 | 
						|
to call i2c_new_probed_device(). The typical case is hardware monitoring
 | 
						|
chips on PC mainboards. There are several dozen models, which can live
 | 
						|
at 25 different addresses. Given the huge number of mainboards out there,
 | 
						|
it is next to impossible to build an exhaustive list of the hardware
 | 
						|
monitoring chips being used. Fortunately, most of these chips have
 | 
						|
manufacturer and device ID registers, so they can be identified by
 | 
						|
probing.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In that case, I2C devices are neither declared nor instantiated
 | 
						|
explicitly. Instead, i2c-core will probe for such devices as soon as their
 | 
						|
drivers are loaded, and if any is found, an I2C device will be
 | 
						|
instantiated automatically. In order to prevent any misbehavior of this
 | 
						|
mechanism, the following restrictions apply:
 | 
						|
* The I2C device driver must implement the detect() method, which
 | 
						|
  identifies a supported device by reading from arbitrary registers.
 | 
						|
* Only buses which are likely to have a supported device and agree to be
 | 
						|
  probed, will be probed. For example this avoids probing for hardware
 | 
						|
  monitoring chips on a TV adapter.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Example:
 | 
						|
See lm90_driver and lm90_detect() in drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
I2C devices instantiated as a result of such a successful probe will be
 | 
						|
destroyed automatically when the driver which detected them is removed,
 | 
						|
or when the underlying I2C bus is itself destroyed, whichever happens
 | 
						|
first.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Those of you familiar with the i2c subsystem of 2.4 kernels and early 2.6
 | 
						|
kernels will find out that this method 3 is essentially similar to what
 | 
						|
was done there. Two significant differences are:
 | 
						|
* Probing is only one way to instantiate I2C devices now, while it was the
 | 
						|
  only way back then. Where possible, methods 1 and 2 should be preferred.
 | 
						|
  Method 3 should only be used when there is no other way, as it can have
 | 
						|
  undesirable side effects.
 | 
						|
* I2C buses must now explicitly say which I2C driver classes can probe
 | 
						|
  them (by the means of the class bitfield), while all I2C buses were
 | 
						|
  probed by default back then. The default is an empty class which means
 | 
						|
  that no probing happens. The purpose of the class bitfield is to limit
 | 
						|
  the aforementioned undesirable side effects.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Once again, method 3 should be avoided wherever possible. Explicit device
 | 
						|
instantiation (methods 1 and 2) is much preferred for it is safer and
 | 
						|
faster.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Method 4: Instantiate from user-space
 | 
						|
-------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In general, the kernel should know which I2C devices are connected and
 | 
						|
what addresses they live at. However, in certain cases, it does not, so a
 | 
						|
sysfs interface was added to let the user provide the information. This
 | 
						|
interface is made of 2 attribute files which are created in every I2C bus
 | 
						|
directory: new_device and delete_device. Both files are write only and you
 | 
						|
must write the right parameters to them in order to properly instantiate,
 | 
						|
respectively delete, an I2C device.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
File new_device takes 2 parameters: the name of the I2C device (a string)
 | 
						|
and the address of the I2C device (a number, typically expressed in
 | 
						|
hexadecimal starting with 0x, but can also be expressed in decimal.)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
File delete_device takes a single parameter: the address of the I2C
 | 
						|
device. As no two devices can live at the same address on a given I2C
 | 
						|
segment, the address is sufficient to uniquely identify the device to be
 | 
						|
deleted.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Example:
 | 
						|
# echo eeprom 0x50 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-3/new_device
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
While this interface should only be used when in-kernel device declaration
 | 
						|
can't be done, there is a variety of cases where it can be helpful:
 | 
						|
* The I2C driver usually detects devices (method 3 above) but the bus
 | 
						|
  segment your device lives on doesn't have the proper class bit set and
 | 
						|
  thus detection doesn't trigger.
 | 
						|
* The I2C driver usually detects devices, but your device lives at an
 | 
						|
  unexpected address.
 | 
						|
* The I2C driver usually detects devices, but your device is not detected,
 | 
						|
  either because the detection routine is too strict, or because your
 | 
						|
  device is not officially supported yet but you know it is compatible.
 | 
						|
* You are developing a driver on a test board, where you soldered the I2C
 | 
						|
  device yourself.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This interface is a replacement for the force_* module parameters some I2C
 | 
						|
drivers implement. Being implemented in i2c-core rather than in each
 | 
						|
device driver individually, it is much more efficient, and also has the
 | 
						|
advantage that you do not have to reload the driver to change a setting.
 | 
						|
You can also instantiate the device before the driver is loaded or even
 | 
						|
available, and you don't need to know what driver the device needs.
 |