 b5cbc369db
			
		
	
	
	b5cbc369db
	
	
	
		
			
			Document the format and semantics of the /proc/fs/nfsd/pool_stats file. Signed-off-by: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			159 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			6.6 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			159 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			6.6 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
| 
 | |
| Kernel NFS Server Statistics
 | |
| ============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document describes the format and semantics of the statistics
 | |
| which the kernel NFS server makes available to userspace.  These
 | |
| statistics are available in several text form pseudo files, each of
 | |
| which is described separately below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In most cases you don't need to know these formats, as the nfsstat(8)
 | |
| program from the nfs-utils distribution provides a helpful command-line
 | |
| interface for extracting and printing them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All the files described here are formatted as a sequence of text lines,
 | |
| separated by newline '\n' characters.  Lines beginning with a hash
 | |
| '#' character are comments intended for humans and should be ignored
 | |
| by parsing routines.  All other lines contain a sequence of fields
 | |
| separated by whitespace.
 | |
| 
 | |
| /proc/fs/nfsd/pool_stats
 | |
| ------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This file is available in kernels from 2.6.30 onwards, if the
 | |
| /proc/fs/nfsd filesystem is mounted (it almost always should be).
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first line is a comment which describes the fields present in
 | |
| all the other lines.  The other lines present the following data as
 | |
| a sequence of unsigned decimal numeric fields.  One line is shown
 | |
| for each NFS thread pool.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All counters are 64 bits wide and wrap naturally.  There is no way
 | |
| to zero these counters, instead applications should do their own
 | |
| rate conversion.
 | |
| 
 | |
| pool
 | |
| 	The id number of the NFS thread pool to which this line applies.
 | |
| 	This number does not change.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	Thread pool ids are a contiguous set of small integers starting
 | |
| 	at zero.  The maximum value depends on the thread pool mode, but
 | |
| 	currently cannot be larger than the number of CPUs in the system.
 | |
| 	Note that in the default case there will be a single thread pool
 | |
| 	which contains all the nfsd threads and all the CPUs in the system,
 | |
| 	and thus this file will have a single line with a pool id of "0".
 | |
| 
 | |
| packets-arrived
 | |
| 	Counts how many NFS packets have arrived.  More precisely, this
 | |
| 	is the number of times that the network stack has notified the
 | |
| 	sunrpc server layer that new data may be available on a transport
 | |
| 	(e.g. an NFS or UDP socket or an NFS/RDMA endpoint).
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	Depending on the NFS workload patterns and various network stack
 | |
| 	effects (such as Large Receive Offload) which can combine packets
 | |
| 	on the wire, this may be either more or less than the number
 | |
| 	of NFS calls received (which statistic is available elsewhere).
 | |
| 	However this is a more accurate and less workload-dependent measure
 | |
| 	of how much CPU load is being placed on the sunrpc server layer
 | |
| 	due to NFS network traffic.
 | |
| 
 | |
| sockets-enqueued
 | |
| 	Counts how many times an NFS transport is enqueued to wait for
 | |
| 	an nfsd thread to service it, i.e. no nfsd thread was considered
 | |
| 	available.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	The circumstance this statistic tracks indicates that there was NFS
 | |
| 	network-facing work to be done but it couldn't be done immediately,
 | |
| 	thus introducing a small delay in servicing NFS calls.  The ideal
 | |
| 	rate of change for this counter is zero; significantly non-zero
 | |
| 	values may indicate a performance limitation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	This can happen either because there are too few nfsd threads in the
 | |
| 	thread pool for the NFS workload (the workload is thread-limited),
 | |
| 	or because the NFS workload needs more CPU time than is available in
 | |
| 	the thread pool (the workload is CPU-limited).  In the former case,
 | |
| 	configuring more nfsd threads will probably improve the performance
 | |
| 	of the NFS workload.  In the latter case, the sunrpc server layer is
 | |
| 	already choosing not to wake idle nfsd threads because there are too
 | |
| 	many nfsd threads which want to run but cannot, so configuring more
 | |
| 	nfsd threads will make no difference whatsoever.  The overloads-avoided
 | |
| 	statistic (see below) can be used to distinguish these cases.
 | |
| 
 | |
| threads-woken
 | |
| 	Counts how many times an idle nfsd thread is woken to try to
 | |
| 	receive some data from an NFS transport.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	This statistic tracks the circumstance where incoming
 | |
| 	network-facing NFS work is being handled quickly, which is a good
 | |
| 	thing.  The ideal rate of change for this counter will be close
 | |
| 	to but less than the rate of change of the packets-arrived counter.
 | |
| 
 | |
| overloads-avoided
 | |
| 	Counts how many times the sunrpc server layer chose not to wake an
 | |
| 	nfsd thread, despite the presence of idle nfsd threads, because
 | |
| 	too many nfsd threads had been recently woken but could not get
 | |
| 	enough CPU time to actually run.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	This statistic counts a circumstance where the sunrpc layer
 | |
| 	heuristically avoids overloading the CPU scheduler with too many
 | |
| 	runnable nfsd threads.  The ideal rate of change for this counter
 | |
| 	is zero.  Significant non-zero values indicate that the workload
 | |
| 	is CPU limited.  Usually this is associated with heavy CPU usage
 | |
| 	on all the CPUs in the nfsd thread pool.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	If a sustained large overloads-avoided rate is detected on a pool,
 | |
| 	the top(1) utility should be used to check for the following
 | |
| 	pattern of CPU usage on all the CPUs associated with the given
 | |
| 	nfsd thread pool.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	 - %us ~= 0 (as you're *NOT* running applications on your NFS server)
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	 - %wa ~= 0
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	 - %id ~= 0
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	 - %sy + %hi + %si ~= 100
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	If this pattern is seen, configuring more nfsd threads will *not*
 | |
| 	improve the performance of the workload.  If this patten is not
 | |
| 	seen, then something more subtle is wrong.
 | |
| 
 | |
| threads-timedout
 | |
| 	Counts how many times an nfsd thread triggered an idle timeout,
 | |
| 	i.e. was not woken to handle any incoming network packets for
 | |
| 	some time.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	This statistic counts a circumstance where there are more nfsd
 | |
| 	threads configured than can be used by the NFS workload.  This is
 | |
| 	a clue that the number of nfsd threads can be reduced without
 | |
| 	affecting performance.  Unfortunately, it's only a clue and not
 | |
| 	a strong indication, for a couple of reasons:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	 - Currently the rate at which the counter is incremented is quite
 | |
| 	   slow; the idle timeout is 60 minutes.  Unless the NFS workload
 | |
| 	   remains constant for hours at a time, this counter is unlikely
 | |
| 	   to be providing information that is still useful.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	 - It is usually a wise policy to provide some slack,
 | |
| 	   i.e. configure a few more nfsds than are currently needed,
 | |
| 	   to allow for future spikes in load.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that incoming packets on NFS transports will be dealt with in
 | |
| one of three ways.  An nfsd thread can be woken (threads-woken counts
 | |
| this case), or the transport can be enqueued for later attention
 | |
| (sockets-enqueued counts this case), or the packet can be temporarily
 | |
| deferred because the transport is currently being used by an nfsd
 | |
| thread.  This last case is not very interesting and is not explicitly
 | |
| counted, but can be inferred from the other counters thus:
 | |
| 
 | |
| packets-deferred = packets-arrived - ( sockets-enqueued + threads-woken )
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| More
 | |
| ----
 | |
| Descriptions of the other statistics file should go here.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
 | |
| 26 Mar 2009
 |