Mostly the glock operations follow the type of the glock. The
one exception is the transaction glock, so we need to check for
that directly.
Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
smbfs has been scheduled for removal in 2.6.27, so
maybe we can now move it to drivers/staging on the
way out.
smbfs still uses the big kernel lock and nobody
is going to fix that, so we should be getting
rid of it soon.
This removes the 32 bit compat mount and ioctl
handling code, which is implemented in common fs
code, and moves all smbfs related files into
drivers/staging/smbfs.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Nobody appears to be interested in fixing autofs3 bugs
any more and it uses the BKL, which is going away.
Move this to staging for retirement. Unless someone
complains until 2.6.38, we can remove it for good.
The include/linux/auto_fs.h header file is still used
by autofs4, so it remains in place.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
If a filesystem has inode size > 128 and someone deletes lost+found and
reuses inode 11 for some other file, extented attributes set for this
inode before umount will get lost after remounting the filesystem. This
is because extended attributes will get stored in an inode but ext3_iget
will ignore them due to workaround of a bug in an old mkfs.
Fix the problem by initializing i_extra_isize to 0 for freshly allocated
inodes where mkfs workaround in ext3_iget applies. This way these inodes
will always store extended attributes in a special block and no problems
occur.
The bug was spotted and a reproduction test provided by:
Masayoshi MIZUMA <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Remove "depends on" line from QUOTACTL config option and rather select
the option explicitely from config options which need it. It makes more
sense this way and also fixes Kconfig warning due to GFS2 selecting
QUOTACTL but QUOTACTL not depending on it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
The patch solves the following warnings message when CONFIG_COMPAT
is not defined:
fs/autofs4/root.c:31: warning: ‘autofs4_root_compat_ioctl’ declared ‘static’ but never defined
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The patch solves the following warnings message when CONFIG_COMPAT
is not defined:
fs/autofs/root.c:30: warning: ‘autofs_root_compat_ioctl’ declared ‘static’ but never defined
Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Otherwise partially updated pointers could be seen if
pointer update is not atomic.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
This prepares the removal of the big kernel lock from the
file locking code. We still use the BKL as long as fs/lockd
uses it and ceph might sleep, but we can flip the definition
to a private spinlock as soon as that's done.
All users outside of fs/lockd get converted to use
lock_flocks() instead of lock_kernel() where appropriate.
Based on an earlier patch to use a spinlock from Matthew
Wilcox, who has attempted this a few times before, the
earliest patch from over 10 years ago turned it into
a semaphore, which ended up being slower than the BKL
and was subsequently reverted.
Someone should do some serious performance testing when
this becomes a spinlock, since this has caused problems
before. Using a spinlock should be at least as good
as the BKL in theory, but who knows...
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Dozen of changes in ncpfs to provide some locking other than BKL.
In readdir cache unlock and mark complete first page as last operation,
so it can be used for synchronization, as code intended.
When updating dentry name on case insensitive filesystems do at least
some basic locking...
Hold i_mutex when updating inode fields.
Push some ncp_conn_is_valid down to ncp_request. Connection can become
invalid at any moment, and fewer error code paths to test the better.
Use i_size_{read,write} to modify file size.
Set inode's backing_dev_info as ncpfs has its own special bdi.
In ioctl unbreak ioctls invoked on filesystem mounted 'ro' - tests are
for inode writeable or owner match, but were turned to filesystem
writeable and inode writeable or owner match. Also collect all permission
checks in single place.
Add some locking, and remove comments saying that it would be cool to
add some locks to the code.
Constify some pointers.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL in ocfs2/dlmfs is used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs
that are all three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore.
The use in ocfs2_control_open is evidently unrelated and the function
is protected by ocfs2_control_lock.
Therefore it is safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super, which are both protected
by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove
the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
The BKL is only used in fill_super, which is protected by the superblocks
s_umount rw_semaphorei, and in fasync, which does not do anything that
could require the BKL. Therefore it is safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super, which are both protected
by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove
the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
autofs4 uses the BKL only to guard its ioctl operations.
This can be trivially converted to use a mutex, as we have
done with most device drivers before.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
As in other file systems, we can replace the big kernel lock
with a private mutex in isofs. This means we can now access
multiple file systems concurrently, but it also means that
we serialize readdir and lookup across sleeping operations
which previously released the big kernel lock. This should
not matter though, as these operations are in practice
serialized through the hardware access.
The isofs_get_blocks functions now does not take any lock
any more, it used to recursively get the BKL. After looking
at the code for hours, I convinced myself that it was never
needed here anyway, because it only reads constant fields
of the inode and writes to a buffer head array that is
at this time only visible to the caller.
The get_sb and fill_super operations do not need the locking
at all because they operate on a file system that is either
about to be created or to be destroyed but in either case
is not visible to other threads.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The lock_kernel in fat_put_super is not needed because
it only protects the super block itself and we know that
no other thread can reach it because we are about to
kfree the object.
In the two fill_super functions, this converts the locking
to use lock_super like elsewhere in the fat code. This
is probably not needed either, but is consistent and puts
us on the safe side.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
The BKL is still used in ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super(), ext2_sync_fs()
ext2_remount() and ext2_write_inode(). From these calls ext2_put_super(),
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_remount() are protected against each other by
the struct super_block s_umount rw semaphore. The call in ext2_write_inode()
could only protect the modification of the ext2_sb_info through
ext2_update_dynamic_rev() against concurrent ext2_sync_fs() or ext2_remount().
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_put_super() can be left out because you need a
valid filesystem reference in all three cases, which you do not have when
you are one of these functions.
If the BKL is only protecting the modification of the ext2_sb_info it can
safely be removed since this is protected by the struct ext2_sb_info s_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
After pushing down the BKL to the get_sb/fill_super operations of the
filesystems that still make usage of the BKL it is safe to remove it from
do_new_mount().
I've read through all the code formerly covered by the BKL inside
do_kern_mount() and have satisfied myself that it doesn't need the BKL
any more.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super that are both protected by
the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove the
BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is still used in ext4_put_super(), ext4_fill_super() and
ext4_remount(). All three calles are protected against concurrent calls by
the s_umount rw semaphore of struct super_block.
Therefore the BKL is protecting nothing in this case.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Acked-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL lock is protecting the remounting against a potential call to
ext3_put_super(). This could not happen, since this is protected by the
s_umount rw semaphore of struct super_block.
Therefore I think the BKL is protecting nothing here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is protecting nothing than two memory allocations here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super that are both protected by
the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove the
BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super that are both protected by
the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove the BKL
entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
This patch is a preparation necessary to remove the BKL from do_new_mount().
It explicitly adds calls to lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() around
get_sb/fill_super operations for filesystems that still uses the BKL.
I've read through all the code formerly covered by the BKL inside
do_kern_mount() and have satisfied myself that it doesn't need the BKL
any more.
do_kern_mount() is already called without the BKL when mounting the rootfs
and in nfsctl. do_kern_mount() calls vfs_kern_mount(), which is called
from various places without BKL: simple_pin_fs(), nfs_do_clone_mount()
through nfs_follow_mountpoint(), afs_mntpt_do_automount() through
afs_mntpt_follow_link(). Both later functions are actually the filesystems
follow_link inode operation. vfs_kern_mount() is calling the specified
get_sb function and lets the filesystem do its job by calling the given
fill_super function.
Therefore I think it is safe to push down the BKL from the VFS to the
low-level filesystems get_sb/fill_super operation.
[arnd: do not add the BKL to those file systems that already
don't use it elsewhere]
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
We currently use struct backing_dev_info for various different purposes.
Originally it was introduced to describe a backing device which includes
an unplug and congestion function and various bits of readahead information
and VM-relevant flags. We're also using for tracking dirty inodes for
writeback.
To make writeback properly find all inodes we need to only access the
per-filesystem backing_device pointed to by the superblock in ->s_bdi
inside the writeback code, and not the instances pointeded to by
inode->i_mapping->backing_dev which can be overriden by special devices
or might not be set at all by some filesystems.
Long term we should split out the writeback-relevant bits of struct
backing_device_info (which includes more than the current bdi_writeback)
and only point to it from the superblock while leaving the traditional
backing device as a separate structure that can be overriden by devices.
The one exception for now is the block device filesystem which really
wants different writeback contexts for it's different (internal) inodes
to handle the writeout more efficiently. For now we do this with
a hack in fs-writeback.c because we're so late in the cycle, but in
the future I plan to replace this with a superblock method that allows
for multiple writeback contexts per filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
fs/fuse/dev.c:1357: warning: ‘total_len’ may be used uninitialized in this
function
Initialize total_len to zero, else its value will be undefined.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Commit 78155ed75f "nfsd4: distinguish
expired from stale stateids" attempted to distinguish expired and stale
stateid's using time information that may not have been completely
reliable, so I reverted it.
That was throwing out the baby with the bathwater; we still do want to
return expired, but let's do that using the simpler approach of just
assuming any stateid is expired if it looks like it was given out by the
current server instance, but we can't find it any more.
This may help clients that are recovering from network partitions.
Reported-by: Bian Naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
As long as we're not implementing any session security, we should just
automatically add any new connections that come along to the list of
sessions associated with the session.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The spec requires us in various places to keep track of the connections
associated with each session.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Changes:
- make sure session memory reservation is released on failure
path.
- use min_t()/min() for more compact code in several places.
- break alloc_init_session into smaller pieces.
- miscellaneous other cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Instead of creating the new rpc client from a regular server thread,
set a flag, kick off a null call, and allow the null call to do the work
of setting up the client on the callback workqueue.
Use a spinlock to ensure the callback work gets a consistent view of the
callback parameters.
This allows, for example, changing the callback from contexts where
sleeping is not allowed. I hope it will also keep the locking simple as
we add more session and trunking features, by serializing most of the
callback-specific work.
This also closes a small race where the the new cb_ident could be used
with an old connection (or vice-versa).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
This will eventually allow us, for example, to kick off null callback
from contexts where we can't sleep.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Make the recall callback code more generic, so that other callbacks
will be able to use it too.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Now that we have both nfsd4_callback and nfsd4_cb_conn structures, I get
confused if variables of both types are always named cb....
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6:
cifs: prevent infinite recursion in cifs_reconnect_tcon
cifs: set backing_dev_info on new S_ISREG inodes
