The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-12-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-11-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-10-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
While at it also add the missing reference around the HW access in
i915_interrupt_info().
v2:
- update the commit message mentioning that this also fixes the
HW access in the interrupt info debugfs entry (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-9-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-8-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-7-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-6-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-5-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Revieved-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
We have many places in the code where we check if a given display power
domain is enabled and if so access registers backed by this power
domain. We assumed that some modeset lock will prevent the power
reference from vanishing in the middle of the HW access, but this
assumption doesn't always hold. In such cases we get either the wakeref
not held, or an unclaimed register access error message. To fix this in
a future-proof way that's independent of other locks wrap any such
access with a get_ref_if_enabled()/put_ref() pair.
Kudos to Ville and Joonas for the ideas of this new interface.
v2:
- init the power_domains ptr when declaring it everywhere (Joonas)
v3:
- don't report the device to be powered if runtime PM is disabled
CC: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455711462-7442-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
Macro module_usb_driver is used for drivers whose init and exit paths
only register and unregister to usb API. So remove boilerplate code to
make code simpler by using module_usb_driver.
This change was made with the help of the following Coccinelle
semantic patch:
//<smpl>
@a@
identifier f, x;
@@
-static f(...) { return usb_register(&x); }
@b depends on a@
identifier e, a.x;
@@
-static e(...) { usb_deregister(&x); }
@c depends on a && b@
identifier a.f;
declarer name module_init;
@@
-module_init(f);
@d depends on a && b && c@
identifier b.e, a.x;
declarer name module_exit;
declarer name module_usb_driver;
@@
-module_exit(e);
+module_usb_driver(x);
//</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160217121327.GA29682@amitoj-Inspiron-3542
userptr requires mmu-notifier for full unprivileged support. Most
systems have mmu-notifier support already enabled as a requirement for
virtualisation support, but we should make the option for i915 to take
advantage of mmu-notifiers explicit (and enable by default so that
regular userspace can take advantage of passing client memory to the
GPU.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1452503961-14837-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Remove the double housekeeping and use something sane to
forcefuly delete BOs on unload.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Splitting it into KB/MB is just confusing.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Not sure why somebody thought that this is a long.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Just use the system queue now that we don't block any more.
v2: handle DAL as well.
v3: agd: split DAL changes out
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykola.lysenko@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (v1)
Just register an callback and reschedule the work item if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
wait_event() never returns before the fence was signaled.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The release notifier can get called a second time from
mmu_notifier_unregister depending on a race between
__mmu_notifier_release and amdgpu_mn_destroy. Use
mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
This supports 420 and 422 subsampling with 2 or 3 planes, tested with
modetest. It doesn't set up chroma subsampling position (which it
appears KMS doesn't deal with yet).
The LBM memory is overallocated in many cases, but apparently the docs
aren't quite correct and I'll probably need to look at the hardware
source to really figure it out.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
This implements a simple policy for choosing scaling modes
(trapezoidal for decimation, PPF for magnification), and a single PPF
filter (Mitchell/Netravali's recommendation).
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
This doesn't matter yet since we only allow 1:1 scaling, but the
comment clearly says we should be using the source size.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Previously we only did the primary and cursor plane, but overlay
planes are useful and just require this setup to add, since all planes
go into the HVS display list in the same way.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
So far, we've only ever lit up one CRTC, so this has been fine. To
extend to more displays or more planes, we need to make sure we don't
run our display lists into each other.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Previously, on every modeset we would allocate new display list
memory, recompute changed planes, write all of them to the new memory,
and pointed scanout at the new list (which will latch approximately at
the next line of scanout). We let
drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks() decide whether we needed to wait
for a vblank after a modeset before cleaning up the old state and
letting the next modeset proceed, and on legacy cursor updates we
wouldn't wait. If you moved the cursor fast enough, we could
potentially wrap around the display list memory area and overwrite the
existing display list while it was still being scanned out, resulting
in the HVS scanning out garbage or just halting.
Instead of making cursor updates wait for scanout to move to the new
display list area (which introduces significant cursor lag in X), we
just rewrite our current display list.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
