sched: Sanitize fork() handling
Currently we try to do task placement in wake_up_new_task() after we do the load-balance pass in sched_fork(). This yields complicated semantics in that we have to deal with tasks on different RQs and the set_task_cpu() calls in copy_process() and sched_fork() Rename ->task_new() to ->task_fork() and call it from sched_fork() before the balancing, this gives the policy a clear point to place the task. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab19cb2331
commit
cd29fe6f26
3 changed files with 34 additions and 43 deletions
|
@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ struct sched_class {
|
|||
|
||||
void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
|
||||
void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
|
||||
void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
|
||||
void (*task_fork) (struct task_struct *p);
|
||||
|
||||
void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
int running);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue