[media] bttv-input: Add a note about PV951 RC
When comparing lirc-i2c and ir-kbd-i2c/bttv-input logic, a difference was noticed. As lirc-i2c will be removed soon, store the difference on a comment inside ir-kbd-i2c, in order to preserve the knowledge we have about that remote controller. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
61ea3aa5bf
commit
b22374544b
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -354,6 +354,18 @@ static int get_key_pv951(struct IR_i2c *ir, u32 *ir_key, u32 *ir_raw)
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
dprintk(KERN_INFO DEVNAME ": key %02x\n", b);
|
dprintk(KERN_INFO DEVNAME ": key %02x\n", b);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* NOTE:
|
||||||
|
* lirc_i2c maps the pv951 code as:
|
||||||
|
* addr = 0x61D6
|
||||||
|
* cmd = bit_reverse (b)
|
||||||
|
* So, it seems that this device uses NEC extended
|
||||||
|
* I decided to not fix the table, due to two reasons:
|
||||||
|
* 1) Without the actual device, this is only a guess;
|
||||||
|
* 2) As the addr is not reported via I2C, nor can be changed,
|
||||||
|
* the device is bound to the vendor-provided RC.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*ir_key = b;
|
*ir_key = b;
|
||||||
*ir_raw = b;
|
*ir_raw = b;
|
||||||
return 1;
|
return 1;
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue