workqueue: note the nested NOT_RUNNING test in worker_clr_flags() isn't a noop
The nested NOT_RUNNING test in worker_clr_flags() is slightly misleading in that if NOT_RUNNING were a single flag the nested test would be always %true and thus noop. Add a comment noting that the test isn't a noop. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
					parent
					
						
							
								e159489baa
							
						
					
				
			
			
				commit
				
					
						42c025f3de
					
				
			
		
					 1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -768,7 +768,11 @@ static inline void worker_clr_flags(struct worker *worker, unsigned int flags)
 | 
			
		|||
 | 
			
		||||
	worker->flags &= ~flags;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
	/* if transitioning out of NOT_RUNNING, increment nr_running */
 | 
			
		||||
	/*
 | 
			
		||||
	 * If transitioning out of NOT_RUNNING, increment nr_running.  Note
 | 
			
		||||
	 * that the nested NOT_RUNNING is not a noop.  NOT_RUNNING is mask
 | 
			
		||||
	 * of multiple flags, not a single flag.
 | 
			
		||||
	 */
 | 
			
		||||
	if ((flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING) && (oflags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
 | 
			
		||||
		if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
 | 
			
		||||
			atomic_inc(get_gcwq_nr_running(gcwq->cpu));
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue