drm/i915: s/i915_wait_request/i915_wait_seqno/g

Wait request is poorly named IMO. After working with these functions for
some time, I feel it's much clearer to name the functions more
appropriately.

Of course we must update the callers to use the new name as well.

This leaves room within our namespace for a *real* wait request function
at some point.

Note to maintainer: this patch is optional.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Ben Widawsky 2012-05-24 15:03:11 -07:00 committed by Daniel Vetter
parent 23ba4fd0a4
commit 199b2bc25b
4 changed files with 9 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -1952,8 +1952,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
* request and object lists appropriately for that event.
*/
int
i915_wait_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
uint32_t seqno)
i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, uint32_t seqno)
{
drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
int ret = 0;
@ -1991,7 +1990,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
* it.
*/
if (obj->active) {
ret = i915_wait_request(obj->ring, obj->last_rendering_seqno);
ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_rendering_seqno);
if (ret)
return ret;
i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(obj->ring);
@ -2264,7 +2263,7 @@ static int i915_ring_idle(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
return ret;
}
return i915_wait_request(ring, i915_gem_next_request_seqno(ring));
return i915_wait_seqno(ring, i915_gem_next_request_seqno(ring));
}
int i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
@ -2468,7 +2467,7 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
}
if (obj->last_fenced_seqno) {
ret = i915_wait_request(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
if (ret)
return ret;