forge/linux-pinenote
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
linux-pinenote/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_emulate.c

360 lines
8.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
/*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
*
* Copyright IBM Corp. 2008
KVM: PPC: booke: Improve timer register emulation Decrementers are now properly driven by TCR/TSR, and the guest has full read/write access to these registers. The decrementer keeps ticking (and setting the TSR bit) regardless of whether the interrupts are enabled with TCR. The decrementer stops at zero, rather than going negative. Decrementers (and FITs, once implemented) are delivered as level-triggered interrupts -- dequeued when the TSR bit is cleared, not on delivery. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> [scottwood@freescale.com: significant changes] Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-11-17 12:39:59 +00:00
* Copyright 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
*
* Authors: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
*/
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <asm/disassemble.h>
#include "booke.h"
#define OP_19_XOP_RFI 50
KVM: PPC: Critical interrupt emulation support rfci instruction and CSRR0/1 registers are emulated. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-06-27 19:37:31 +00:00
#define OP_19_XOP_RFCI 51
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
#define OP_31_XOP_MFMSR 83
#define OP_31_XOP_WRTEE 131
#define OP_31_XOP_MTMSR 146
#define OP_31_XOP_WRTEEI 163
static void kvmppc_emul_rfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
KVM: PPC: Convert SRR0 and SRR1 to shared page The SRR0 and SRR1 registers contain cached values of the PC and MSR respectively. They get written to by the hypervisor when an interrupt occurs or directly by the kernel. They are also used to tell the rfi(d) instruction where to jump to. Because it only gets touched on defined events that, it's very simple to share with the guest. Hypervisor and guest both have full r/w access. This patch converts all users of the current field to the shared page. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 14:47:46 +02:00
vcpu->arch.pc = vcpu->arch.shared->srr0;
kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, vcpu->arch.shared->srr1);
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
}
KVM: PPC: Critical interrupt emulation support rfci instruction and CSRR0/1 registers are emulated. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-06-27 19:37:31 +00:00
static void kvmppc_emul_rfci(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
vcpu->arch.pc = vcpu->arch.csrr0;
kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, vcpu->arch.csrr1);
}
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
int kvmppc_booke_emulate_op(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned int inst, int *advance)
{
int emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up instruction parsing Instructions on PPC are pretty similarly encoded. So instead of every instruction emulation code decoding the instruction fields itself, we can move that code to more generic places and rely on the compiler to optimize the unused bits away. This has 2 advantages. It makes the code smaller and it makes the code less error prone, as the instruction fields are always available, so accidental misusage is reduced. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:01:33 +02:00
int rs = get_rs(inst);
int rt = get_rt(inst);
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
switch (get_op(inst)) {
case 19:
switch (get_xop(inst)) {
case OP_19_XOP_RFI:
kvmppc_emul_rfi(vcpu);
kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_RFI_EXITS);
*advance = 0;
break;
KVM: PPC: Critical interrupt emulation support rfci instruction and CSRR0/1 registers are emulated. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-06-27 19:37:31 +00:00
case OP_19_XOP_RFCI:
kvmppc_emul_rfci(vcpu);
kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_RFCI_EXITS);
*advance = 0;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
default:
emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
break;
}
break;
case 31:
switch (get_xop(inst)) {
case OP_31_XOP_MFMSR:
KVM: PPC: Convert MSR to shared page One of the most obvious registers to share with the guest directly is the MSR. The MSR contains the "interrupts enabled" flag which the guest has to toggle in critical sections. So in order to bring the overhead of interrupt en- and disabling down, let's put msr into the shared page. Keep in mind that even though you can fully read its contents, writing to it doesn't always update all state. There are a few safe fields that don't require hypervisor interaction. See the documentation for a list of MSR bits that are safe to be set from inside the guest. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 14:47:43 +02:00
kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, rt, vcpu->arch.shared->msr);
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_MFMSR_EXITS);
break;
case OP_31_XOP_MTMSR:
kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_MTMSR_EXITS);
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, rs));
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case OP_31_XOP_WRTEE:
KVM: PPC: Convert MSR to shared page One of the most obvious registers to share with the guest directly is the MSR. The MSR contains the "interrupts enabled" flag which the guest has to toggle in critical sections. So in order to bring the overhead of interrupt en- and disabling down, let's put msr into the shared page. Keep in mind that even though you can fully read its contents, writing to it doesn't always update all state. There are a few safe fields that don't require hypervisor interaction. See the documentation for a list of MSR bits that are safe to be set from inside the guest. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 14:47:43 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->msr = (vcpu->arch.shared->msr & ~MSR_EE)
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
| (kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, rs) & MSR_EE);
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_WRTEE_EXITS);
break;
case OP_31_XOP_WRTEEI:
KVM: PPC: Convert MSR to shared page One of the most obvious registers to share with the guest directly is the MSR. The MSR contains the "interrupts enabled" flag which the guest has to toggle in critical sections. So in order to bring the overhead of interrupt en- and disabling down, let's put msr into the shared page. Keep in mind that even though you can fully read its contents, writing to it doesn't always update all state. There are a few safe fields that don't require hypervisor interaction. See the documentation for a list of MSR bits that are safe to be set from inside the guest. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 14:47:43 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->msr = (vcpu->arch.shared->msr & ~MSR_EE)
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
| (inst & MSR_EE);
kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_WRTEE_EXITS);
break;
default:
emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
}
break;
default:
emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
}
return emulated;
}
KVM: PPC: booke: category E.HV (GS-mode) support Chips such as e500mc that implement category E.HV in Power ISA 2.06 provide hardware virtualization features, including a new MSR mode for guest state. The guest OS can perform many operations without trapping into the hypervisor, including transitions to and from guest userspace. Since we can use SRR1[GS] to reliably tell whether an exception came from guest state, instead of messing around with IVPR, we use DO_KVM similarly to book3s. Current issues include: - Machine checks from guest state are not routed to the host handler. - The guest can cause a host oops by executing an emulated instruction in a page that lacks read permission. Existing e500/4xx support has the same problem. Includes work by Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>, Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>, and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: remove pt_regs usage] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-12-20 15:34:43 +00:00
/*
* NOTE: some of these registers are not emulated on BOOKE_HV (GS-mode).
* Their backing store is in real registers, and these functions
* will return the wrong result if called for them in another context
* (such as debugging).
*/
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
int kvmppc_booke_emulate_mtspr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int sprn, ulong spr_val)
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
{
int emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
switch (sprn) {
case SPRN_DEAR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->dar = spr_val;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_ESR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->esr = spr_val;
break;
KVM: PPC: Critical interrupt emulation support rfci instruction and CSRR0/1 registers are emulated. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-06-27 19:37:31 +00:00
case SPRN_CSRR0:
vcpu->arch.csrr0 = spr_val;
break;
case SPRN_CSRR1:
vcpu->arch.csrr1 = spr_val;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_DBCR0:
booke: Added ONE_REG interface for IAC/DAC debug registers IAC/DAC are defined as 32 bit while they are 64 bit wide. So ONE_REG interface is added to set/get them. Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-08-08 21:17:55 +00:00
vcpu->arch.dbg_reg.dbcr0 = spr_val;
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_DBCR1:
booke: Added ONE_REG interface for IAC/DAC debug registers IAC/DAC are defined as 32 bit while they are 64 bit wide. So ONE_REG interface is added to set/get them. Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-08-08 21:17:55 +00:00
vcpu->arch.dbg_reg.dbcr1 = spr_val;
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
break;
KVM: ppc: Add dbsr in kvm_vcpu_arch Kernel for E500 need clear dbsr when startup. So add dbsr register in kvm_vcpu_arch for BOOKE. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:07 -06:00
case SPRN_DBSR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
vcpu->arch.dbsr &= ~spr_val;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_TSR:
KVM: PPC: booke: Improve timer register emulation Decrementers are now properly driven by TCR/TSR, and the guest has full read/write access to these registers. The decrementer keeps ticking (and setting the TSR bit) regardless of whether the interrupts are enabled with TCR. The decrementer stops at zero, rather than going negative. Decrementers (and FITs, once implemented) are delivered as level-triggered interrupts -- dequeued when the TSR bit is cleared, not on delivery. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> [scottwood@freescale.com: significant changes] Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-11-17 12:39:59 +00:00
kvmppc_clr_tsr_bits(vcpu, spr_val);
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_TCR:
KVM: PPC: booke: Add watchdog emulation This patch adds the watchdog emulation in KVM. The watchdog emulation is enabled by KVM_ENABLE_CAP(KVM_CAP_PPC_BOOKE_WATCHDOG) ioctl. The kernel timer are used for watchdog emulation and emulates h/w watchdog state machine. On watchdog timer expiry, it exit to QEMU if TCR.WRC is non ZERO. QEMU can reset/shutdown etc depending upon how it is configured. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [bharat.bhushan@freescale.com: reworked patch] Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> [agraf: adjust to new request framework] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-08-08 20:38:19 +00:00
/*
* WRC is a 2-bit field that is supposed to preserve its
* value once written to non-zero.
*/
if (vcpu->arch.tcr & TCR_WRC_MASK) {
spr_val &= ~TCR_WRC_MASK;
spr_val |= vcpu->arch.tcr & TCR_WRC_MASK;
}
KVM: PPC: booke: Improve timer register emulation Decrementers are now properly driven by TCR/TSR, and the guest has full read/write access to these registers. The decrementer keeps ticking (and setting the TSR bit) regardless of whether the interrupts are enabled with TCR. The decrementer stops at zero, rather than going negative. Decrementers (and FITs, once implemented) are delivered as level-triggered interrupts -- dequeued when the TSR bit is cleared, not on delivery. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> [scottwood@freescale.com: significant changes] Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-11-17 12:39:59 +00:00
kvmppc_set_tcr(vcpu, spr_val);
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
KVM: PPC: booke: Added DECAR support Added the decrementer auto-reload support. DECAR is readable on e500v2/e500mc and later cpus. Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-20 23:21:23 +00:00
case SPRN_DECAR:
vcpu->arch.decar = spr_val;
break;
KVM: PPC: booke: category E.HV (GS-mode) support Chips such as e500mc that implement category E.HV in Power ISA 2.06 provide hardware virtualization features, including a new MSR mode for guest state. The guest OS can perform many operations without trapping into the hypervisor, including transitions to and from guest userspace. Since we can use SRR1[GS] to reliably tell whether an exception came from guest state, instead of messing around with IVPR, we use DO_KVM similarly to book3s. Current issues include: - Machine checks from guest state are not routed to the host handler. - The guest can cause a host oops by executing an emulated instruction in a page that lacks read permission. Existing e500/4xx support has the same problem. Includes work by Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>, Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>, and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: remove pt_regs usage] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-12-20 15:34:43 +00:00
/*
* Note: SPRG4-7 are user-readable.
* These values are loaded into the real SPRGs when resuming the
* guest (PR-mode only).
*/
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_SPRG4:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->sprg4 = spr_val;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_SPRG5:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->sprg5 = spr_val;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_SPRG6:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->sprg6 = spr_val;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_SPRG7:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
vcpu->arch.shared->sprg7 = spr_val;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_IVPR:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivpr = spr_val;
KVM: PPC: booke: category E.HV (GS-mode) support Chips such as e500mc that implement category E.HV in Power ISA 2.06 provide hardware virtualization features, including a new MSR mode for guest state. The guest OS can perform many operations without trapping into the hypervisor, including transitions to and from guest userspace. Since we can use SRR1[GS] to reliably tell whether an exception came from guest state, instead of messing around with IVPR, we use DO_KVM similarly to book3s. Current issues include: - Machine checks from guest state are not routed to the host handler. - The guest can cause a host oops by executing an emulated instruction in a page that lacks read permission. Existing e500/4xx support has the same problem. Includes work by Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>, Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>, and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: remove pt_regs usage] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-12-20 15:34:43 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
mtspr(SPRN_GIVPR, spr_val);
#endif
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR0:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_CRITICAL] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR1:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_MACHINE_CHECK] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR2:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DATA_STORAGE] = spr_val;
KVM: PPC: booke: category E.HV (GS-mode) support Chips such as e500mc that implement category E.HV in Power ISA 2.06 provide hardware virtualization features, including a new MSR mode for guest state. The guest OS can perform many operations without trapping into the hypervisor, including transitions to and from guest userspace. Since we can use SRR1[GS] to reliably tell whether an exception came from guest state, instead of messing around with IVPR, we use DO_KVM similarly to book3s. Current issues include: - Machine checks from guest state are not routed to the host handler. - The guest can cause a host oops by executing an emulated instruction in a page that lacks read permission. Existing e500/4xx support has the same problem. Includes work by Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>, Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>, and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: remove pt_regs usage] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-12-20 15:34:43 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
mtspr(SPRN_GIVOR2, spr_val);
#endif
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR3:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_INST_STORAGE] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR4:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_EXTERNAL] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR5:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ALIGNMENT] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR6:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_PROGRAM] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR7:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_FP_UNAVAIL] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR8:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SYSCALL] = spr_val;
KVM: PPC: booke: category E.HV (GS-mode) support Chips such as e500mc that implement category E.HV in Power ISA 2.06 provide hardware virtualization features, including a new MSR mode for guest state. The guest OS can perform many operations without trapping into the hypervisor, including transitions to and from guest userspace. Since we can use SRR1[GS] to reliably tell whether an exception came from guest state, instead of messing around with IVPR, we use DO_KVM similarly to book3s. Current issues include: - Machine checks from guest state are not routed to the host handler. - The guest can cause a host oops by executing an emulated instruction in a page that lacks read permission. Existing e500/4xx support has the same problem. Includes work by Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@freescale.com>, Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>, and Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> [agraf: remove pt_regs usage] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-12-20 15:34:43 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
mtspr(SPRN_GIVOR8, spr_val);
#endif
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR9:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_AP_UNAVAIL] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR10:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DECREMENTER] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR11:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_FIT] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR12:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_WATCHDOG] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR13:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DTLB_MISS] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR14:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ITLB_MISS] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR15:
KVM: PPC: Use accessor functions for GPR access All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-01-08 02:58:01 +01:00
vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DEBUG] = spr_val;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
KVM: PPC: BookE: Add MCSR SPR support Add support for the MCSR SPR. This only implements the SPR storage bits, not actual machine checks. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-08-13 14:50:54 +02:00
case SPRN_MCSR:
vcpu->arch.mcsr &= ~spr_val;
break;
KVM: PPC: bookehv: Add EPCR support in mtspr/mfspr emulation Add EPCR support in booke mtspr/mfspr emulation. EPCR register is defined only for 64-bit and HV categories, we will expose it at this point only to 64-bit virtual processors running on 64-bit HV hosts. Define a reusable setter function for vcpu's EPCR. Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com> [agraf: move HV dependency in the code] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-10-11 06:13:27 +00:00
#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
case SPRN_EPCR:
kvmppc_set_epcr(vcpu, spr_val);
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
mtspr(SPRN_EPCR, vcpu->arch.shadow_epcr);
#endif
break;
#endif
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
default:
emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
}
return emulated;
}
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
int kvmppc_booke_emulate_mfspr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int sprn, ulong *spr_val)
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
{
int emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
switch (sprn) {
case SPRN_IVPR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivpr;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_DEAR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.shared->dar;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_ESR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.shared->esr;
break;
KVM: PPC: BookE: Emulate mfspr on EPR The EPR register is potentially valid for PR KVM as well, so we need to emulate accesses to it. It's only defined for reading, so only handle the mfspr case. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2013-01-04 18:02:14 +01:00
case SPRN_EPR:
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.epr;
break;
KVM: PPC: Critical interrupt emulation support rfci instruction and CSRR0/1 registers are emulated. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-06-27 19:37:31 +00:00
case SPRN_CSRR0:
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.csrr0;
break;
case SPRN_CSRR1:
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.csrr1;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_DBCR0:
booke: Added ONE_REG interface for IAC/DAC debug registers IAC/DAC are defined as 32 bit while they are 64 bit wide. So ONE_REG interface is added to set/get them. Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-08-08 21:17:55 +00:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.dbg_reg.dbcr0;
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_DBCR1:
booke: Added ONE_REG interface for IAC/DAC debug registers IAC/DAC are defined as 32 bit while they are 64 bit wide. So ONE_REG interface is added to set/get them. Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-08-08 21:17:55 +00:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.dbg_reg.dbcr1;
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
break;
KVM: ppc: Add dbsr in kvm_vcpu_arch Kernel for E500 need clear dbsr when startup. So add dbsr register in kvm_vcpu_arch for BOOKE. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:07 -06:00
case SPRN_DBSR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.dbsr;
break;
KVM: PPC: booke: Improve timer register emulation Decrementers are now properly driven by TCR/TSR, and the guest has full read/write access to these registers. The decrementer keeps ticking (and setting the TSR bit) regardless of whether the interrupts are enabled with TCR. The decrementer stops at zero, rather than going negative. Decrementers (and FITs, once implemented) are delivered as level-triggered interrupts -- dequeued when the TSR bit is cleared, not on delivery. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> [scottwood@freescale.com: significant changes] Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-11-17 12:39:59 +00:00
case SPRN_TSR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.tsr;
break;
KVM: PPC: booke: Improve timer register emulation Decrementers are now properly driven by TCR/TSR, and the guest has full read/write access to these registers. The decrementer keeps ticking (and setting the TSR bit) regardless of whether the interrupts are enabled with TCR. The decrementer stops at zero, rather than going negative. Decrementers (and FITs, once implemented) are delivered as level-triggered interrupts -- dequeued when the TSR bit is cleared, not on delivery. Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com> [scottwood@freescale.com: significant changes] Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2011-11-17 12:39:59 +00:00
case SPRN_TCR:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.tcr;
break;
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
case SPRN_IVOR0:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_CRITICAL];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR1:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_MACHINE_CHECK];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR2:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DATA_STORAGE];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR3:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_INST_STORAGE];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR4:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_EXTERNAL];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR5:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ALIGNMENT];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR6:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_PROGRAM];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR7:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_FP_UNAVAIL];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR8:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SYSCALL];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR9:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_AP_UNAVAIL];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR10:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DECREMENTER];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR11:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_FIT];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR12:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_WATCHDOG];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR13:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DTLB_MISS];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR14:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ITLB_MISS];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
case SPRN_IVOR15:
KVM: PPC: Emulator: clean up SPR reads and writes When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself. This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else? Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is always a bad idea. So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to. Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-05-04 14:55:12 +02:00
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.ivor[BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DEBUG];
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
break;
KVM: PPC: BookE: Add MCSR SPR support Add support for the MCSR SPR. This only implements the SPR storage bits, not actual machine checks. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-08-13 14:50:54 +02:00
case SPRN_MCSR:
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.mcsr;
break;
KVM: PPC: bookehv: Add EPCR support in mtspr/mfspr emulation Add EPCR support in booke mtspr/mfspr emulation. EPCR register is defined only for 64-bit and HV categories, we will expose it at this point only to 64-bit virtual processors running on 64-bit HV hosts. Define a reusable setter function for vcpu's EPCR. Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com> [agraf: move HV dependency in the code] Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
2012-10-11 06:13:27 +00:00
#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
case SPRN_EPCR:
*spr_val = vcpu->arch.epcr;
break;
#endif
KVM: ppc: split out common Book E instruction emulation The Book E code will be shared with e500. I've left PID in kvmppc_core_emulate_op() just so that we don't need to move kvmppc_set_pid() right now. Once we have the e500 implementation, we can probably share that too. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2009-01-03 16:23:06 -06:00
default:
emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
}
return emulated;
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink