forge/linux-pinenote
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
linux-pinenote/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm-def.h

13 lines
279 B
C
Raw Normal View History

perf bench: Add feature that measures the performance of the arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S memcpy routines via 'perf bench mem' This patch ports arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S to perf bench mem memcpy for benchmarking memcpy() in userland with tricky and dirty way. util/include/asm/cpufeature.h, util/include/asm/dwarf2.h, and util/include/linux/linkage.h are mostly dummy files with small wrappers, so that we are able to include memcpy_64.S unmodified. Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Cc: h.mitake@gmail.com Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Ma Ling <ling.ma@intel.com> Cc: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> LKML-Reference: <1290668693-27068-2-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-11-25 16:04:53 +09:00
perf/bench: Fix mem* routines usage after alternatives change Adjust perf bench to the new changes in the alternatives code for memcpy/memset. Reviewed-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-02-26 18:38:16 +01:00
MEMCPY_FN(memcpy_orig,
perf bench: Add feature that measures the performance of the arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S memcpy routines via 'perf bench mem' This patch ports arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S to perf bench mem memcpy for benchmarking memcpy() in userland with tricky and dirty way. util/include/asm/cpufeature.h, util/include/asm/dwarf2.h, and util/include/linux/linkage.h are mostly dummy files with small wrappers, so that we are able to include memcpy_64.S unmodified. Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Cc: h.mitake@gmail.com Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Ma Ling <ling.ma@intel.com> Cc: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> LKML-Reference: <1290668693-27068-2-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-11-25 16:04:53 +09:00
"x86-64-unrolled",
"unrolled memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S")
perf bench: Also allow measuring alternative memcpy implementations Intended to be able to support the current selection of the preferred memcpy() implementation, this patch adds the ability to also measure the two alternative implementations, again by way of using some pre-processsor replacement. While on my Westmere system this proves that the movsb based variant is worse than the movsq based one (since the ERMS feature isn't there), it also shows that here for the default as well as small sizes the unrolled variant outperforms the movsq one. Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F16D728020000780006D732@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-01-18 13:28:56 +00:00
perf/bench: Fix mem* routines usage after alternatives change Adjust perf bench to the new changes in the alternatives code for memcpy/memset. Reviewed-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-02-26 18:38:16 +01:00
MEMCPY_FN(__memcpy,
perf bench: Also allow measuring alternative memcpy implementations Intended to be able to support the current selection of the preferred memcpy() implementation, this patch adds the ability to also measure the two alternative implementations, again by way of using some pre-processsor replacement. While on my Westmere system this proves that the movsb based variant is worse than the movsq based one (since the ERMS feature isn't there), it also shows that here for the default as well as small sizes the unrolled variant outperforms the movsq one. Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F16D728020000780006D732@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-01-18 13:28:56 +00:00
"x86-64-movsq",
"movsq-based memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S")
perf/bench: Fix mem* routines usage after alternatives change Adjust perf bench to the new changes in the alternatives code for memcpy/memset. Reviewed-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-02-26 18:38:16 +01:00
MEMCPY_FN(memcpy_erms,
perf bench: Also allow measuring alternative memcpy implementations Intended to be able to support the current selection of the preferred memcpy() implementation, this patch adds the ability to also measure the two alternative implementations, again by way of using some pre-processsor replacement. While on my Westmere system this proves that the movsb based variant is worse than the movsq based one (since the ERMS feature isn't there), it also shows that here for the default as well as small sizes the unrolled variant outperforms the movsq one. Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F16D728020000780006D732@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-01-18 13:28:56 +00:00
"x86-64-movsb",
"movsb-based memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S")
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink