forge/linux-pinenote
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
linux-pinenote/fs/reiserfs/procfs.c

509 lines
13 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
/* -*- linux-c -*- */
/* fs/reiserfs/procfs.c */
/*
* Copyright 2000 by Hans Reiser, licensing governed by reiserfs/README
*/
/* proc info support a la one created by Sizif@Botik.RU for PGC */
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
move private bits of reiserfs_fs.h to fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-17 01:16:43 -04:00
#include "reiserfs.h"
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
/*
* LOCKING:
*
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
* These guys are evicted from procfs as the very first step in ->kill_sb().
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
*
*/
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
static int show_version(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
struct super_block *sb = m->private;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
char *format;
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
if (REISERFS_SB(sb)->s_properties & (1 << REISERFS_3_6)) {
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
format = "3.6";
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
} else if (REISERFS_SB(sb)->s_properties & (1 << REISERFS_3_5)) {
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
format = "3.5";
} else {
format = "unknown";
}
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "%s format\twith checks %s\n", format,
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
#if defined( CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK )
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
"on"
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
#else
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
"off"
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
#endif
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 0;
}
#define SF( x ) ( r -> x )
#define SFP( x ) SF( s_proc_info_data.x )
#define SFPL( x ) SFP( x[ level ] )
#define SFPF( x ) SFP( scan_bitmap.x )
#define SFPJ( x ) SFP( journal.x )
#define D2C( x ) le16_to_cpu( x )
#define D4C( x ) le32_to_cpu( x )
#define DF( x ) D2C( rs -> s_v1.x )
#define DFL( x ) D4C( rs -> s_v1.x )
#define objectid_map( s, rs ) (old_format_only (s) ? \
[PATCH] reiserfs endianness: annotate little-endian objects little-endian objects annotated as such; again, obviously no changes of resulting code, we only replace __u16 with __le16, etc. in relevant places. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Cc: <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-01 08:59:18 -07:00
(__le32 *)((struct reiserfs_super_block_v1 *)rs + 1) : \
(__le32 *)(rs + 1))
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
#define MAP( i ) D4C( objectid_map( sb, rs )[ i ] )
#define DJF( x ) le32_to_cpu( rs -> x )
#define DJV( x ) le32_to_cpu( s_v1 -> x )
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
#define DJP( x ) le32_to_cpu( jp -> x )
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
#define JF( x ) ( r -> s_journal -> x )
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
static int show_super(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
struct super_block *sb = m->private;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
struct reiserfs_sb_info *r = REISERFS_SB(sb);
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "state: \t%s\n"
"mount options: \t%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n"
"gen. counter: \t%i\n"
"s_disk_reads: \t%i\n"
"s_disk_writes: \t%i\n"
"s_fix_nodes: \t%i\n"
"s_do_balance: \t%i\n"
"s_unneeded_left_neighbor: \t%i\n"
"s_good_search_by_key_reada: \t%i\n"
"s_bmaps: \t%i\n"
"s_bmaps_without_search: \t%i\n"
"s_direct2indirect: \t%i\n"
"s_indirect2direct: \t%i\n"
"\n"
"max_hash_collisions: \t%i\n"
"breads: \t%lu\n"
"bread_misses: \t%lu\n"
"search_by_key: \t%lu\n"
"search_by_key_fs_changed: \t%lu\n"
"search_by_key_restarted: \t%lu\n"
"insert_item_restarted: \t%lu\n"
"paste_into_item_restarted: \t%lu\n"
"cut_from_item_restarted: \t%lu\n"
"delete_solid_item_restarted: \t%lu\n"
"delete_item_restarted: \t%lu\n"
"leaked_oid: \t%lu\n"
"leaves_removable: \t%lu\n",
SF(s_mount_state) == REISERFS_VALID_FS ?
"REISERFS_VALID_FS" : "REISERFS_ERROR_FS",
reiserfs_r5_hash(sb) ? "FORCE_R5 " : "",
reiserfs_rupasov_hash(sb) ? "FORCE_RUPASOV " : "",
reiserfs_tea_hash(sb) ? "FORCE_TEA " : "",
reiserfs_hash_detect(sb) ? "DETECT_HASH " : "",
reiserfs_no_border(sb) ? "NO_BORDER " : "BORDER ",
reiserfs_no_unhashed_relocation(sb) ?
"NO_UNHASHED_RELOCATION " : "",
reiserfs_hashed_relocation(sb) ? "UNHASHED_RELOCATION " : "",
reiserfs_test4(sb) ? "TEST4 " : "",
have_large_tails(sb) ? "TAILS " : have_small_tails(sb) ?
"SMALL_TAILS " : "NO_TAILS ",
replay_only(sb) ? "REPLAY_ONLY " : "",
convert_reiserfs(sb) ? "CONV " : "",
[PATCH] reiserfs: remove kmalloc wrapper Remove kmalloc() wrapper from fs/reiserfs/. Please note that a reiserfs /proc entry format is changed because kmalloc statistics is removed. Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-02-01 03:06:43 -08:00
atomic_read(&r->s_generation_counter),
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
SF(s_disk_reads), SF(s_disk_writes), SF(s_fix_nodes),
SF(s_do_balance), SF(s_unneeded_left_neighbor),
SF(s_good_search_by_key_reada), SF(s_bmaps),
SF(s_bmaps_without_search), SF(s_direct2indirect),
SF(s_indirect2direct), SFP(max_hash_collisions), SFP(breads),
SFP(bread_miss), SFP(search_by_key),
SFP(search_by_key_fs_changed), SFP(search_by_key_restarted),
SFP(insert_item_restarted), SFP(paste_into_item_restarted),
SFP(cut_from_item_restarted),
SFP(delete_solid_item_restarted), SFP(delete_item_restarted),
SFP(leaked_oid), SFP(leaves_removable));
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 0;
}
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
static int show_per_level(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
struct super_block *sb = m->private;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
struct reiserfs_sb_info *r = REISERFS_SB(sb);
int level;
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "level\t"
" balances"
" [sbk: reads"
" fs_changed"
" restarted]"
" free space"
" items"
" can_remove"
" lnum"
" rnum"
" lbytes"
" rbytes"
" get_neig"
" get_neig_res" " need_l_neig" " need_r_neig" "\n");
for (level = 0; level < MAX_HEIGHT; ++level) {
seq_printf(m, "%i\t"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12li"
" %12li"
" %12li"
" %12li"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
" %12lu"
"\n",
level,
SFPL(balance_at),
SFPL(sbk_read_at),
SFPL(sbk_fs_changed),
SFPL(sbk_restarted),
SFPL(free_at),
SFPL(items_at),
SFPL(can_node_be_removed),
SFPL(lnum),
SFPL(rnum),
SFPL(lbytes),
SFPL(rbytes),
SFPL(get_neighbors),
SFPL(get_neighbors_restart),
SFPL(need_l_neighbor), SFPL(need_r_neighbor)
);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
}
return 0;
}
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
static int show_bitmap(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
struct super_block *sb = m->private;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
struct reiserfs_sb_info *r = REISERFS_SB(sb);
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "free_block: %lu\n"
" scan_bitmap:"
" wait"
" bmap"
" retry"
" stolen"
" journal_hint"
"journal_nohint"
"\n"
" %14lu"
" %14lu"
" %14lu"
" %14lu"
" %14lu"
" %14lu"
" %14lu"
"\n",
SFP(free_block),
SFPF(call),
SFPF(wait),
SFPF(bmap),
SFPF(retry),
SFPF(stolen),
SFPF(in_journal_hint), SFPF(in_journal_nohint));
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 0;
}
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
static int show_on_disk_super(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
struct super_block *sb = m->private;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
struct reiserfs_sb_info *sb_info = REISERFS_SB(sb);
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
struct reiserfs_super_block *rs = sb_info->s_rs;
int hash_code = DFL(s_hash_function_code);
__u32 flags = DJF(s_flags);
seq_printf(m, "block_count: \t%i\n"
"free_blocks: \t%i\n"
"root_block: \t%i\n"
"blocksize: \t%i\n"
"oid_maxsize: \t%i\n"
"oid_cursize: \t%i\n"
"umount_state: \t%i\n"
"magic: \t%10.10s\n"
"fs_state: \t%i\n"
"hash: \t%s\n"
"tree_height: \t%i\n"
"bmap_nr: \t%i\n"
"version: \t%i\n"
"flags: \t%x[%s]\n"
"reserved_for_journal: \t%i\n",
DFL(s_block_count),
DFL(s_free_blocks),
DFL(s_root_block),
DF(s_blocksize),
DF(s_oid_maxsize),
DF(s_oid_cursize),
DF(s_umount_state),
rs->s_v1.s_magic,
DF(s_fs_state),
hash_code == TEA_HASH ? "tea" :
(hash_code == YURA_HASH) ? "rupasov" :
(hash_code == R5_HASH) ? "r5" :
(hash_code == UNSET_HASH) ? "unset" : "unknown",
DF(s_tree_height),
DF(s_bmap_nr),
DF(s_version), flags, (flags & reiserfs_attrs_cleared)
? "attrs_cleared" : "", DF(s_reserved_for_journal));
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 0;
}
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
static int show_oidmap(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
struct super_block *sb = m->private;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
struct reiserfs_sb_info *sb_info = REISERFS_SB(sb);
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
struct reiserfs_super_block *rs = sb_info->s_rs;
unsigned int mapsize = le16_to_cpu(rs->s_v1.s_oid_cursize);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
unsigned long total_used = 0;
int i;
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
for (i = 0; i < mapsize; ++i) {
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
__u32 right;
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
right = (i == mapsize - 1) ? MAX_KEY_OBJECTID : MAP(i + 1);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "%s: [ %x .. %x )\n",
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
(i & 1) ? "free" : "used", MAP(i), right);
if (!(i & 1)) {
total_used += right - MAP(i);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
}
}
#if defined( REISERFS_USE_OIDMAPF )
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
if (sb_info->oidmap.use_file && (sb_info->oidmap.mapf != NULL)) {
new helper: file_inode(file) Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-01-23 17:07:38 -05:00
loff_t size = file_inode(sb_info->oidmap.mapf)->i_size;
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
total_used += size / sizeof(reiserfs_oidinterval_d_t);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
}
#endif
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "total: \t%i [%i/%i] used: %lu [exact]\n",
mapsize,
mapsize, le16_to_cpu(rs->s_v1.s_oid_maxsize), total_used);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 0;
}
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
static int show_journal(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
struct super_block *sb = m->private;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
struct reiserfs_sb_info *r = REISERFS_SB(sb);
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
struct reiserfs_super_block *rs = r->s_rs;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
struct journal_params *jp = &rs->s_v1.s_journal;
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
seq_printf(m, /* on-disk fields */
"jp_journal_1st_block: \t%i\n"
"jp_journal_dev: \t%s[%x]\n"
"jp_journal_size: \t%i\n"
"jp_journal_trans_max: \t%i\n"
"jp_journal_magic: \t%i\n"
"jp_journal_max_batch: \t%i\n"
"jp_journal_max_commit_age: \t%i\n"
"jp_journal_max_trans_age: \t%i\n"
/* incore fields */
"j_1st_reserved_block: \t%i\n"
"j_state: \t%li\n"
reiserfs: audit transaction ids to always be unsigned ints This patch fixes up the reiserfs code such that transaction ids are always unsigned ints. In places they can currently be signed ints or unsigned longs. The former just causes an annoying clm-2200 warning and may join a transaction when it should wait. The latter is just for correctness since the disk format uses a 32-bit transaction id. There aren't any runtime problems that result from it not wrapping at the correct location since the value is truncated correctly even on big endian systems. The 0 value might make it to disk, but the mount-time checks will bump it to 10 itself. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-30 14:02:17 -04:00
"j_trans_id: \t%u\n"
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
"j_mount_id: \t%lu\n"
"j_start: \t%lu\n"
"j_len: \t%lu\n"
"j_len_alloc: \t%lu\n"
"j_wcount: \t%i\n"
"j_bcount: \t%lu\n"
"j_first_unflushed_offset: \t%lu\n"
reiserfs: audit transaction ids to always be unsigned ints This patch fixes up the reiserfs code such that transaction ids are always unsigned ints. In places they can currently be signed ints or unsigned longs. The former just causes an annoying clm-2200 warning and may join a transaction when it should wait. The latter is just for correctness since the disk format uses a 32-bit transaction id. There aren't any runtime problems that result from it not wrapping at the correct location since the value is truncated correctly even on big endian systems. The 0 value might make it to disk, but the mount-time checks will bump it to 10 itself. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-30 14:02:17 -04:00
"j_last_flush_trans_id: \t%u\n"
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
"j_trans_start_time: \t%li\n"
"j_list_bitmap_index: \t%i\n"
"j_must_wait: \t%i\n"
"j_next_full_flush: \t%i\n"
"j_next_async_flush: \t%i\n"
"j_cnode_used: \t%i\n" "j_cnode_free: \t%i\n" "\n"
/* reiserfs_proc_info_data_t.journal fields */
"in_journal: \t%12lu\n"
"in_journal_bitmap: \t%12lu\n"
"in_journal_reusable: \t%12lu\n"
"lock_journal: \t%12lu\n"
"lock_journal_wait: \t%12lu\n"
"journal_begin: \t%12lu\n"
"journal_relock_writers: \t%12lu\n"
"journal_relock_wcount: \t%12lu\n"
"mark_dirty: \t%12lu\n"
"mark_dirty_already: \t%12lu\n"
"mark_dirty_notjournal: \t%12lu\n"
"restore_prepared: \t%12lu\n"
"prepare: \t%12lu\n"
"prepare_retry: \t%12lu\n",
DJP(jp_journal_1st_block),
bdevname(SB_JOURNAL(sb)->j_dev_bd, b),
DJP(jp_journal_dev),
DJP(jp_journal_size),
DJP(jp_journal_trans_max),
DJP(jp_journal_magic),
DJP(jp_journal_max_batch),
SB_JOURNAL(sb)->j_max_commit_age,
DJP(jp_journal_max_trans_age),
JF(j_1st_reserved_block),
JF(j_state),
JF(j_trans_id),
JF(j_mount_id),
JF(j_start),
JF(j_len),
JF(j_len_alloc),
atomic_read(&r->s_journal->j_wcount),
JF(j_bcount),
JF(j_first_unflushed_offset),
JF(j_last_flush_trans_id),
JF(j_trans_start_time),
JF(j_list_bitmap_index),
JF(j_must_wait),
JF(j_next_full_flush),
JF(j_next_async_flush),
JF(j_cnode_used),
JF(j_cnode_free),
SFPJ(in_journal),
SFPJ(in_journal_bitmap),
SFPJ(in_journal_reusable),
SFPJ(lock_journal),
SFPJ(lock_journal_wait),
SFPJ(journal_being),
SFPJ(journal_relock_writers),
SFPJ(journal_relock_wcount),
SFPJ(mark_dirty),
SFPJ(mark_dirty_already),
SFPJ(mark_dirty_notjournal),
SFPJ(restore_prepared), SFPJ(prepare), SFPJ(prepare_retry)
);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 0;
}
static int r_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
return single_open(file, PDE_DATA(inode),
proc_get_parent_data(inode));
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
}
[PATCH] Make most file operations structs in fs/ const This is a conversion to make the various file_operations structs in fs/ const. Basically a regexp job, with a few manual fixups The goal is both to increase correctness (harder to accidentally write to shared datastructures) and reducing the false sharing of cachelines with things that get dirty in .data (while .rodata is nicely read only and thus cache clean) Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-28 01:56:42 -08:00
static const struct file_operations r_file_operations = {
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
.open = r_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
.release = single_release,
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
};
static struct proc_dir_entry *proc_info_root = NULL;
static const char proc_info_root_name[] = "fs/reiserfs";
static void add_file(struct super_block *sb, char *name,
reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e. since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong; if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*, we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(), called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry() for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along. Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance - all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need sget() to keep the sucker alive. As the matter of fact, we can get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open() instead. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-05 17:37:37 +04:00
int (*func) (struct seq_file *, void *))
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: use non-racy method for proc entries creation Use proc_create()/proc_create_data() to make sure that ->proc_fops and ->data be setup before gluing PDE to main tree. /proc entry owner is also added. Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-29 01:02:09 -07:00
proc_create_data(name, 0, REISERFS_SB(sb)->procdir,
&r_file_operations, func);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
}
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
int reiserfs_proc_info_init(struct super_block *sb)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
[PATCH] reiserfs: fix handling of device names with /'s in them On systems with block devices containing a slash (virtual dasd, cciss, etc), reiserfs will fail to initialize /proc/fs/reiserfs/<dev> due to it being interpreted as a subdirectory. The generic block device code changes the / to ! for use in the sysfs tree. This patch uses that convention. Tested by making dm devices use dm/<number> rather than dm-<number> [akpm@osdl.org: name variables consistently] Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-14 00:24:22 -07:00
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
char *s;
/* Some block devices use /'s */
kill reiserfs_bdevname() it's never called with NULL argument... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-11-22 13:25:39 -05:00
strlcpy(b, sb->s_id, BDEVNAME_SIZE);
[PATCH] reiserfs: fix handling of device names with /'s in them On systems with block devices containing a slash (virtual dasd, cciss, etc), reiserfs will fail to initialize /proc/fs/reiserfs/<dev> due to it being interpreted as a subdirectory. The generic block device code changes the / to ! for use in the sysfs tree. This patch uses that convention. Tested by making dm devices use dm/<number> rather than dm-<number> [akpm@osdl.org: name variables consistently] Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-14 00:24:22 -07:00
s = strchr(b, '/');
if (s)
*s = '!';
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
spin_lock_init(&__PINFO(sb).lock);
proc: Add proc_mkdir_data() Add proc_mkdir_data() to allow procfs directories to be created that are annotated at the time of creation with private data rather than doing this post-creation. This means no access is then required to the proc_dir_entry struct to set this. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> cc: Neela Syam Kolli <megaraidlinux@lsi.com> cc: Jerry Chuang <jerry-chuang@realtek.com> cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-04-12 02:48:30 +01:00
REISERFS_SB(sb)->procdir = proc_mkdir_data(b, 0, proc_info_root, sb);
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
if (REISERFS_SB(sb)->procdir) {
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
add_file(sb, "version", show_version);
add_file(sb, "super", show_super);
add_file(sb, "per-level", show_per_level);
add_file(sb, "bitmap", show_bitmap);
add_file(sb, "on-disk-super", show_on_disk_super);
add_file(sb, "oidmap", show_oidmap);
add_file(sb, "journal", show_journal);
return 0;
}
reiserfs: rework reiserfs_warning ReiserFS warnings can be somewhat inconsistent. In some cases: * a unique identifier may be associated with it * the function name may be included * the device may be printed separately This patch aims to make warnings more consistent. reiserfs_warning() prints the device name, so printing it a second time is not required. The function name for a warning is always helpful in debugging, so it is now automatically inserted into the output. Hans has stated that every warning should have a unique identifier. Some cases lack them, others really shouldn't have them. reiserfs_warning() now expects an id associated with each message. In the rare case where one isn't needed, "" will suffice. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-30 14:02:21 -04:00
reiserfs_warning(sb, "cannot create /proc/%s/%s",
[PATCH] reiserfs: fix handling of device names with /'s in them On systems with block devices containing a slash (virtual dasd, cciss, etc), reiserfs will fail to initialize /proc/fs/reiserfs/<dev> due to it being interpreted as a subdirectory. The generic block device code changes the / to ! for use in the sysfs tree. This patch uses that convention. Tested by making dm devices use dm/<number> rather than dm-<number> [akpm@osdl.org: name variables consistently] Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-14 00:24:22 -07:00
proc_info_root_name, b);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 1;
}
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
int reiserfs_proc_info_done(struct super_block *sb)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
struct proc_dir_entry *de = REISERFS_SB(sb)->procdir;
reiserfs: use proc_remove_subtree() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-03-30 20:16:20 -04:00
if (de) {
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
char *s;
[PATCH] reiserfs: fix handling of device names with /'s in them On systems with block devices containing a slash (virtual dasd, cciss, etc), reiserfs will fail to initialize /proc/fs/reiserfs/<dev> due to it being interpreted as a subdirectory. The generic block device code changes the / to ! for use in the sysfs tree. This patch uses that convention. Tested by making dm devices use dm/<number> rather than dm-<number> [akpm@osdl.org: name variables consistently] Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-14 00:24:22 -07:00
reiserfs: use proc_remove_subtree() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-03-30 20:16:20 -04:00
/* Some block devices use /'s */
kill reiserfs_bdevname() it's never called with NULL argument... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-11-22 13:25:39 -05:00
strlcpy(b, sb->s_id, BDEVNAME_SIZE);
reiserfs: use proc_remove_subtree() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-03-30 20:16:20 -04:00
s = strchr(b, '/');
if (s)
*s = '!';
[PATCH] reiserfs: fix handling of device names with /'s in them On systems with block devices containing a slash (virtual dasd, cciss, etc), reiserfs will fail to initialize /proc/fs/reiserfs/<dev> due to it being interpreted as a subdirectory. The generic block device code changes the / to ! for use in the sysfs tree. This patch uses that convention. Tested by making dm devices use dm/<number> rather than dm-<number> [akpm@osdl.org: name variables consistently] Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-14 00:24:22 -07:00
reiserfs: use proc_remove_subtree() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-03-30 20:16:20 -04:00
remove_proc_subtree(b, proc_info_root);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
REISERFS_SB(sb)->procdir = NULL;
}
return 0;
}
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
int reiserfs_proc_info_global_init(void)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
if (proc_info_root == NULL) {
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
proc_info_root = proc_mkdir(proc_info_root_name, NULL);
proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting in module refcount underflow. We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops and ->data. But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment) and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give some thoughts. ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for protection. rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm. And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular. We definitely don't want such modular code. Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller. So, let's nuke it. Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
2009-03-25 22:48:06 +03:00
if (!proc_info_root) {
reiserfs: rework reiserfs_warning ReiserFS warnings can be somewhat inconsistent. In some cases: * a unique identifier may be associated with it * the function name may be included * the device may be printed separately This patch aims to make warnings more consistent. reiserfs_warning() prints the device name, so printing it a second time is not required. The function name for a warning is always helpful in debugging, so it is now automatically inserted into the output. Hans has stated that every warning should have a unique identifier. Some cases lack them, others really shouldn't have them. reiserfs_warning() now expects an id associated with each message. In the rare case where one isn't needed, "" will suffice. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-30 14:02:21 -04:00
reiserfs_warning(NULL, "cannot create /proc/%s",
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
proc_info_root_name);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
int reiserfs_proc_info_global_done(void)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
{
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code This was a pure indentation change, using: scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h to make reiserfs match the regular Linux indentation style. As Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes: The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style standard outlined in Documentation/CodingStyle. This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h. There are places where the code can be made to look better, but I'd rather keep those patches separate so that there isn't a subtle by-hand hand accident in the middle of a huge patch. To be clear: This patch is reformatting *only*. A number of patches may follow that continue to make the code more consistent with the Linux coding style. Hans wasn't particularly enthusiastic about these patches, but said he wouldn't really oppose them either. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12 20:21:28 -07:00
if (proc_info_root != NULL) {
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
proc_info_root = NULL;
remove_proc_entry(proc_info_root_name, NULL);
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Revision 1.1.8.2 2001/07/15 17:08:42 god
* . use get_super() in procfs.c
* . remove remove_save_link() from reiserfs_do_truncate()
*
* I accept terms and conditions stated in the Legal Agreement
* (available at http://www.namesys.com/legalese.html)
*
* Revision 1.1.8.1 2001/07/11 16:48:50 god
* proc info support
*
* I accept terms and conditions stated in the Legal Agreement
* (available at http://www.namesys.com/legalese.html)
*
*/
reiserfs: strip trailing whitespace This patch strips trailing whitespace from the reiserfs code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-30 14:02:44 -04:00
/*
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
* Make Linus happy.
* Local variables:
* c-indentation-style: "K&R"
* mode-name: "LC"
* c-basic-offset: 8
* tab-width: 8
* End:
*/
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink